Maintaining research integrity in the age of GenAI: an analysis of ethical challenges and recommendations to researchers

Сохранение целостности исследований в эпоху GenAI: анализ этических проблем и рекомендации для исследователей
Mike Perkins, Sonja Bjelobaba, Lorna Waddington, Tomáš Foltýnek, Sabuj Bhattacharyya, Debora Weber-Wulff
2025-07-02

GenAIGenerative Artificial Intelligenceacademic writingbiascopyright violationsethical challengesethical recommendationsfabricationhallucinationsliterature reviewsprivacyresearch integrityresearch life‑cycletransparency
Abstract Background This paper is a practice‑informed rapid review that maps the complex ethical challenges arising from the growing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools across the research life‑cycle. Earlier research primarily focused on academic integrity concerns related to students’ use of GenAI tools; however, limited information is available on the impact of GenAI on academic research. This study aims to examine the ethical concerns arising from the use of GenAI across different phases of research and explores potential strategies to encourage its ethical use for research purposes. Methods We selected one or more GenAI platforms applicable to various research phases (e.g. developing research questions, conducting literature reviews, processing data, and academic writing) and analysed them to identify potential ethical concerns relevant for that stage. Results The analysis revealed several ethical concerns, including a lack of transparency, bias, censorship, fabrication (e.g. hallucinations and false data generation), copyright violations, and privacy issues. These findings underscore the need for cautious and mindful use of GenAI. Conclusions The advancement and use of GenAI are continuously evolving, necessitating an ongoing in-depth evaluation. We propose a set of practical recommendations to support researchers in effectively integrating these tools while adhering to the fundamental principles of ethical research practices.
1
GenAI use across the research lifecycle raises multiple ethical concerns, not just student academic integrity issues.
2
Key identified ethical issues include lack of transparency, bias, censorship, fabrication (hallucinations and false data), copyright violations, and privacy breaches.
3
Ongoing, in-depth evaluation of GenAI is necessary because tools and their impacts are continuously evolving.
4
The authors propose practical recommendations to help researchers integrate GenAI while upholding core ethical research principles.
5
The study mapped ethical risks for GenAI at different research stages (question development, literature review, data processing, academic writing).

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools used across the research life‑cycle

Ethical challenges and recommendations for maintaining research integrity when using GenAI across different research phases (transparency, bias, censorship, fabrication, copyright, privacy) and strategies to encourage ethical use

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-07-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
30
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mike Perkins
Sonja Bjelobaba
Lorna Waddington
Tomáš Foltýnek
Sabuj Bhattacharyya
Debora Weber-Wulff
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%