Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells

Аналитическая модель для прогнозирования продуктивности радиально-боковых скважин
Boyun Guo, Rashid Shaibu, Xu Yang
2020-12-03

permeability anisotropyproductivity prediction modelpseudo-steady state flowradial jet drillingradial-lateral wells
An analytical model for predicting the productivity of Radial-lateral wells (RLW) drilled using radial jet drilling technology was developed in this work. The model assumes uniformly distributed equal-geometry laterals draining oil or gas under pseudo-steady state flow conditions within the lateral-reached drainage area. A numerical simulation and production data from three field cases of RLW were used to compare and validate the model. The result indicates that the model overestimates the well production rates for wells by 7.7%, 3.25%, and 8.8%, respectively. The error is attributed to several sources including, lack of data for well skin factor, uncertainty of horizontal permeability (kH) in the well area, uncertainty of permeability anisotropy (Iani), and uncertainty in bottom hole pressure (pw). Error analysis of uncertainties in kH, Iani, and pw showed that the model could predict productivity well with an acceptable error (10%) over practical ranges of these parameter values. Parameter sensitivity analyses showed that an increasing number of laterals, lateral length, and horizontal permeability would almost proportionally increase productivity. Well productivity is sensitive to well skin factor and oil viscosity, but not sensitive to the radius of the lateral.
1
An analytical model was developed to predict productivity of radial-lateral wells (RLW) drilled using radial jet drilling under pseudo-steady state flow.
2
Error analysis indicates the model can predict productivity within an acceptable 10% error across practical ranges of kH, Iani, and pw.
3
Model assumes uniformly distributed equal-geometry laterals draining within a lateral-reached drainage area.
4
Model validation against numerical simulation and three field RLW cases showed overestimation of production by 7.7%, 3.25%, and 8.8%.
5
Observed errors are attributed to lack of skin factor data and uncertainties in horizontal permeability (kH), permeability anisotropy (Iani), and bottom hole pressure (pw).
6
Sensitivity analysis shows productivity increases almost proportionally with number of laterals, lateral length, and horizontal permeability.
7
Well productivity is sensitive to well skin factor and oil viscosity but insensitive to lateral radius.

Radial-lateral wells drilled using radial jet drilling technology

Predicting productivity (production rates) of radial-lateral wells under pseudo-steady state flow, including sensitivity to number and length of laterals, horizontal permeability, permeability anisotropy, well skin factor, bottom hole pressure, and fluid viscosity, and validation against numerical simulation and field data

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-12-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Boyun Guo
Rashid Shaibu
Xu Yang
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%