Augmentation of Well Productivity Using Slant and Horizontal Wells
Повышение продуктивности скважин с помощью наклонных и горизонтальных скважин
1986-10-05
SCID: 54.1/g4vpys65
Discuss with AI
effective wellbore radiusgas coning tendencyhorizontal well productivity equationreservoir anisotropyslant wells
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
ABSTRACT This paper presents an equation to calculate the productivity of horizontal wells and a derivation of that equation using potential fluid flow theory. This equation may also be used to account for reservoir anisotropy and well eccentricity (i.e., horizontal well location other than mid-height of a reservoir). The theoretical predictions were used to calculate the effective well bore radius and the effective skin factors of horizontal wells. Laboratory experiments using an electrical analog were also conducted. The present laboratory experimental data and also the laboratory data available in the literature show good agreement with the theoretical equation, indicating its accuracy. The paper also compares vertical, slant, and horizontal well productivity indices, assuming an equal drainage area. In addition, the comparison also assumes an equal reservoir contact area for slant and horizontal wells. The results show that in a 100 ft (30.48 m) thick reservoir, horizontal well productivities are 2 to 5 times greater than unstimulated vertical or slant well productivities, depending upon reservoir anisotropy. Conversely, in a 400 ft (122 m) thick reservoir, slant wells perform better than horizontal wells if vertical permeability is less than the horizontal permeability. Horizontal wells perform significantly better than vertical wells in reservoirs with gas cap and/or bottom water. This study reports an equation to compare horizontal and vertical well gas coning tendencies. The results indicate that horizontal wells are suitable for reservoirs which are thin, show high vertical permeability or exhibit gas and water coning problems. The equations reported in this paper should be useful in an initial evaluation of a horizontal well drilling proposal.
Key Findings
1
Derived an equation for horizontal well productivity using potential fluid flow theory that accounts for reservoir anisotropy and well eccentricity.
2
For a 100 ft (30.48 m) thick reservoir, horizontal well productivities are 2 to 5 times greater than unstimulated vertical or slant wells, depending on anisotropy.
3
Horizontal wells perform significantly better than vertical wells in reservoirs with gas caps and/or bottom water.
4
In a 400 ft (122 m) thick reservoir, slant wells outperform horizontal wells when vertical permeability is less than horizontal permeability.
5
Laboratory electrical-analog experiments and literature data show good agreement with the theoretical equation, indicating its accuracy.
6
Presented an equation to compare gas coning tendencies of horizontal and vertical wells; horizontal wells are suitable for thin reservoirs, high vertical permeability, or coning problems.
7
The reported equations are recommended for initial evaluation of horizontal well drilling proposals.
8
Used theoretical predictions to calculate effective wellbore radius and effective skin factors for horizontal wells.
Research Object
Slant and horizontal wells in petroleum reservoirs
Research Subject
Productivity and related performance metrics (productivity index, effective wellbore radius, effective skin factor, and gas/water coning tendency) of slant versus horizontal and vertical wells under varying reservoir thickness and anisotropy
Publication Details
Publication Date
1986-10-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest