Economics of robots and automation in field crop production

Экономика роботизации и автоматизации в производстве полевых культур
James Lowenberg‐DeBoer, Iona Yuelu Huang, Vasileios Grigoriadis, Simon Blackmore
2019-05-17

agricultural roboticsautonomous agricultural equipmentfield crop productionmechatronic automationpartial budgeting
This study reviewed research published after 1990 on the economics of agricultural mechatronic automation and robotics, and identified research gaps. A systematic search was conducted from the following databases: ScienceDirect, Business Source Complete, Wiley, Emerald, CAB Abstract, Greenfile, Food Science Source and AgEcon Search. This identified 4817 documents. The screening of abstracts narrowed the range to a dataset of 119 full text documents. After eligibility assessment, 18 studies were subjected to a qualitative analysis, with ten focused on automation of specific horticultural operations and eight related to autonomous agricultural equipment. All of the studies found some scenarios in which automation and robotic technologies were profitable. Most studies employed partial budgeting considering only costs and revenues directly changed by the introduction of automation or robotics and assuming everything else constant. None examined cropping system changes, or regional and national impacts on markets, trade and labour demand. The review identified a need for in-depth research on the economic implications of the technology. Most of the studies reviewed estimated economic implications assuming that technology design parameters were achieved and/or based on data from prototypes. Data are needed on the benefits and problems with using automation and robotics on farm. All of the studies reviewed were in the context of agriculture in developed countries, but many of the world’s most pressing agricultural problems are in the developing world. Economic and social research is needed to understand those developing country problems, and guide the engineers and scientists creating automation and robotic solutions.
1
A systematic review identified 4,817 documents, narrowed to 119 full texts, with 18 studies meeting eligibility for qualitative analysis.
2
All studies identified at least some scenarios in which agricultural automation and robotic technologies were profitable.
3
Evidence is concentrated in developed-country agriculture, highlighting the need for economic and social research on automation’s relevance to developing-country agricultural problems.
4
Existing research largely ignored cropping-system changes and regional or national effects on markets, trade, and labor demand, while relying on prototype data or assumed design performance.
5
Most studies used partial budgeting, examining only directly changed costs and revenues while assuming other factors remained constant.
6
The reviewed studies included ten on automating specific horticultural operations and eight on autonomous agricultural equipment.

Agricultural mechatronic automation and robotics in field crop production

The economic profitability and broader economic implications of adopting automation and robotic technologies, including effects on cropping systems, markets, trade, labour demand, and farm benefits and problems

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-05-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
James Lowenberg‐DeBoer
Iona Yuelu Huang
Vasileios Grigoriadis
Simon Blackmore
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%