Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Предпочтительные элементы отчетности для систематических обзоров и метаанализов: заявление PRISMA
Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, Jennifer Tetzlaff, A. Liberati, for the PRISMA Group
2009-07-21
SCID:  54.1/78n7ps93 Discuss with AI
PRISMA statementflow of informationmeta-analysesstructured summarysystematic reviews
Abstract (AI)
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Key Findings
1
PRISMA distinguishes between numbers of studies included in qualitative synthesis and in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis).
2
PRISMA mandates reporting the number of records identified through database searching and additional sources, and the number after duplicates removed.
3
PRISMA requires reporting the flow of information through review phases, including numbers identified, screened, eligible, and included.
4
The PRISMA statement specifies a structured summary should include background, objectives, data sources, eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions, implications, and registration number.
Research Object

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting process

Research Subject

Preferred reporting items (standards) for structuring and reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including summary elements, flow of information, study selection, synthesis inclusion, and reporting transparency

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-07-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Douglas G. Altman
David Moher
Jennifer Tetzlaff
A. Liberati
for the PRISMA Group
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%