Dual transformation pathways in supply chains: linking national reforms to efficiency gains and capability development

Двойные пути трансформации в цепочках поставок: связь национальных реформ с приростом эффективности и развитием способностей
Shatha Alabduljabbar
2026-06-15

Digitalization, Localization and Regulatory ReformDual Transformation PathwaysOrganizational ReadinessPartial Least Squares SEMSupply Chain Transformation
Purpose This study aims to examine how national reform policies shape supply chain transformation through two distinct but interrelated pathways: Pathway A (short-term efficiency and service performance gains) and Pathway B (long-term capability development via organizational readiness). Using Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 as the empirical context, this study addresses how policy-driven reforms translate into firm-level outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was used. Survey data from 247 supply chain professionals across 14 sectors were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. These findings were complemented by 20 semi-structured interviews. Multi-group and mediation analyses were conducted to examine sectoral variation and the mechanisms linking reform drivers to transformation outcomes. Findings The results reveal a dominant efficiency-oriented pathway. Pathway A accounts for 54%–65% of observed effects, while Pathway B explains 35%–46%. Digitalization, localization and regulatory reform activate both pathways, but with clear sectoral contingencies. Logistics sectors prioritize efficiency gains, whereas manufacturing sectors emphasize capability development. Organizational readiness operates as a dynamic capability mediating reform–performance relationships. IoT, AI and blockchain enable both immediate operational improvements and longer-term adaptive capacity. Research limitations/implications The findings are grounded in a Saudi Arabian reform context and a cross-sectional design, which may limit generalizability to other institutional environments. Future research could adopt longitudinal and comparative multi-country designs to examine how dual transformation pathways evolve across sectors and policy contexts. Practical implications This study provides managers and policymakers with the Dual Transformation Readiness Framework (DTRF), a diagnostic tool for aligning reform initiatives with organizational readiness, sectoral conditions and staged technology adoption strategies. The framework supports evidence-based prioritization of both efficiency-oriented and capability-building investments. Social implications The findings demonstrate that coordinated national reforms spanning digitalization, localization and regulatory restructuring can strengthen supply chain resilience, workforce adaptability and long-term capability development, thereby supporting broader economic transformation objectives. Originality/value This study advances supply chain transformation theory by developing a dual-pathway framework that moves beyond single-mechanism explanations. It reconceptualizes organizational readiness as a dynamic, multidimensional capability. This study also demonstrates how national reforms operate through a coordinated architecture of digitalization, localization and regulatory change. By integrating institutional and contingency perspectives, it explains sectoral variation in transformation responses. The DTRF is introduced as a diagnostic tool for aligning reform pressures with organizational capabilities.
1
Digitalization, localization and regulatory reform activate both pathways, with IoT, AI and blockchain enabling immediate operational improvements and longer-term adaptive capacity.
2
Organizational readiness functions as a dynamic capability mediating the relationship between national reforms and firm-level performance outcomes.
3
Pathway A (efficiency-oriented) accounts for 54%–65% of observed reform effects, while Pathway B (capability development) explains 35%–46%.
4
Sectoral contingencies exist: logistics sectors prioritize efficiency gains, whereas manufacturing sectors emphasize capability development.
5
Supply chain transformation follows two interrelated pathways: Pathway A (short-term efficiency and service performance gains) and Pathway B (long-term capability development via organizational readiness).

Supply chains in Saudi Arabia operating under national reform policies (Saudi Vision 2030)

How national reform policies (digitalization, localization, regulatory reform) drive dual transformation pathways in supply chains—Pathway A: short-term efficiency and service performance gains; Pathway B: long-term capability development mediated by organizational readiness—and sectoral variation in these effects

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-06-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Shatha Alabduljabbar
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%