AI outperforms humans in establishing interpersonal closeness in emotionally engaging interactions, but only when labelled as human

ИИ превосходит людей в установлении межличностной близости в эмоционально вовлекающих взаимодействиях, но только когда его представляют как человека
Tobias Kleinert, Marie Waldschütz, Julian Blau, Markus Heinrichs, Bastian Schiller
2026-01-14

Fast Friends Proceduredouble-blind randomized controlled studiesinterpersonal closenesslarge language modelsself-disclosure
With the increasing accessibility of large language models to the public, questions arise about whether, and under what conditions, social-emotional interactions with artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to human-like relationship building. Across two double-blind randomised controlled studies with pre-registered analyses, 492 participants engaged in dyadic online interactions using a modified, text-based version of the 'Fast Friends Procedure' (a method designed to enable rapid relationship building), with pre-generated responses by either human partners or a minimally prompted large language model. When labelled as human, the AI outperformed human partners in establishing feelings of closeness during emotionally engaging 'deep-talk' interactions. This striking effect appears to stem from the AI's higher levels of self-disclosure, which in turn enhanced participants' perceptions of closeness. Labelling the partner as an AI reduced, but did not eliminate, relationship building, likely due to participants' lower motivation to engage in interactions with an AI, reflected in both shorter responses and reduced feelings of closeness. These findings highlight AI's potential to relieve overburdened social fields while underscoring the urgent need for ethical safeguards to prevent its misuse in fostering deceptive social connections.
1
AI’s advantage appeared to result from higher levels of self-disclosure, which increased participants’ perceived closeness.
2
Across two double-blind randomized controlled studies involving 492 participants, AI and human partners were compared in text-based Fast Friends interactions.
3
Labelling the partner as AI reduced, but did not eliminate, relationship building, likely because participants provided shorter responses and were less motivated to engage.
4
The findings indicate potential for AI to support overburdened social domains while raising ethical concerns about deceptive social connections.
5
When labelled as human, AI outperformed human partners in creating feelings of interpersonal closeness during emotionally engaging deep-talk interactions.

Dyadic online interactions between human participants and human- or AI-labelled partners using pre-generated responses from humans or a large language model

Establishment of interpersonal closeness during emotionally engaging deep-talk interactions, including the roles of partner labelling, AI self-disclosure, and participants’ motivation to engage

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
11
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Tobias Kleinert
Marie Waldschütz
Julian Blau
Markus Heinrichs
Bastian Schiller
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%