Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review

Социальные отношения и риск смертности: метааналитический обзор
Julianne Holt‐Lunstad, Timothy B. Smith, J. Bradley Layton
2010-07-27

meta-analytic reviewmortality risksocial integrationsocial relationshipssurvival
BACKGROUND: The quality and quantity of individuals' social relationships has been linked not only to mental health but also to both morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analytic review was conducted to determine the extent to which social relationships influence risk for mortality, which aspects of social relationships are most highly predictive, and which factors may moderate the risk. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on several participant characteristics, including cause of mortality, initial health status, and pre-existing health conditions, as well as on study characteristics, including length of follow-up and type of assessment of social relationships. RESULTS: Across 148 studies (308,849 participants), the random effects weighted average effect size was OR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.59), indicating a 50% increased likelihood of survival for participants with stronger social relationships. This finding remained consistent across age, sex, initial health status, cause of death, and follow-up period. Significant differences were found across the type of social measurement evaluated (p<0.001); the association was strongest for complex measures of social integration (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.23) and lowest for binary indicators of residential status (living alone versus with others) (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of social relationships on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
1
A meta-analysis of 148 studies involving 308,849 participants found that stronger social relationships were associated with a 50% greater likelihood of survival (OR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.42–1.59).
2
Binary residential-status measures, such as living alone versus with others, showed the weakest association and were not clearly significant (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99–1.44).
3
Complex measures of social integration showed the strongest association with survival (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63–2.23).
4
The association between social relationships and mortality remained consistent across age, sex, initial health status, cause of death, and follow-up duration.
5
The mortality influence of social relationships was comparable to that of established mortality risk factors.

Social relationships

The association between the quality and quantity of social relationships and mortality risk, including the moderating effects of participant and study characteristics

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-07-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Julianne Holt‐Lunstad
Timothy B. Smith
J. Bradley Layton
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%