DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS*

ПЕРЕЕЗЖАЕТ ЛИ ПРЕСТУПНОСТЬ ПРОСТО ЗА УГОЛ? КОНТРОЛИРУЕМОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННОГО ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ И РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИЯ ПОЛЕЗНОГО ЭФФЕКТА КОНТРОЛЯ ПРЕСТУПНОСТИ
David Weisburd, Laura Wyckoff, Justin Ready, John E. Eck, Joshua C. Hinkle, Frank Gajewski
2006-08-01

controlled study Jersey Citycrime hot spotsdiffusion of crime control benefitshot spots policingspatial displacement
Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites—“do they simply move crime around the corner”? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby—what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street‐level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as “catchment areas” from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20‐minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the corner. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.
1
Findings specifically pertain to crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, indicating non-displacement in these contexts.
2
Focused police interventions at two street-level hot spots did not cause immediate spatial displacement of drug- and prostitution-related crime to neighboring catchment areas.
3
Study used a controlled design with two targeted sites, two neighboring catchment areas, over 6,000 20-minute social observations, interviews, and ethnographic fieldwork to assess displacement/diffusion.
4
The most likely outcome observed was a diffusion of crime control benefits from targeted sites to nearby areas.

Focused crime prevention interventions at specific street-level hot spot sites in Jersey City and their neighboring catchment areas

Immediate spatial displacement versus diffusion of crime control benefits—whether crime moves to nearby areas or whether interventions produce reductions in crime in adjacent catchment areas (for crimes involving drugs and prostitution)

Publication Details
Publication Date
2006-08-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
David Weisburd
Laura Wyckoff
Justin Ready
John E. Eck
Joshua C. Hinkle
Frank Gajewski
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%