The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Рейтинг Лейдена 2011/2012: сбор данных, показатели и интерпретация
Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Anthony F. J. van Raan, Robert Tijssen, Clara Calero‐Medina, Joost Kosten, Ed Noyons, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Martijn S. Visser
2012-11-06

Leiden Ranking 2011/2012bibliometric indicatorsfractional countinghighly cited publicationsstability intervals
The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 is a ranking of universities based on bibliometric indicators of publication output, citation impact, and scientific collaboration. The ranking includes 500 major universities from 41 different countries. This paper provides an extensive discussion of the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012. The ranking is compared with other global university rankings, in particular the Academic Ranking of World Universities (commonly known as the Shanghai Ranking) and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. The comparison focuses on the methodological choices underlying the different rankings. Also, a detailed description is offered of the data collection methodology of the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 and of the indicators used in the ranking. Various innovations in the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 are presented. These innovations include (1) an indicator based on counting a university's highly cited publications, (2) indicators based on fractional rather than full counting of collaborative publications, (3) the possibility of excluding non‐English language publications, and (4) the use of stability intervals. Finally, some comments are made on the interpretation of the ranking and a number of limitations of the ranking are pointed out.
1
Added options to exclude non‑English language publications and to report stability intervals for indicator robustness.
2
Comparison with Shanghai and Times Higher Education rankings highlights differing methodological choices underlying global rankings.
3
Introduced an indicator counting a university's highly cited publications as a novel metric in the 2011/2012 ranking.
4
Introduced fractional counting indicators for collaborative publications, replacing or complementing full counting approaches.
5
Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 ranks 500 major universities from 41 countries using bibliometric indicators of output, citation impact, and collaboration.
6
The paper details data collection methodology and the specific indicators used in the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012.
7
The paper identifies and discusses interpretation issues and several limitations of the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012.

The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 (university ranking based on bibliometric data)

Data collection methodology, bibliometric indicators (publication output, citation impact, collaboration, highly cited counts, fractional vs full counting, exclusion of non‑English publications) and interpretation including stability intervals and methodological comparisons with other global rankings

Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-11-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Paul Wouters
Ludo Waltman
Nees Jan van Eck
Anthony F. J. van Raan
Robert Tijssen
Clara Calero‐Medina
Joost Kosten
Ed Noyons
Thed N. van Leeuwen
Martijn S. Visser
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%