The Hitchhiker's Guide to Autonomous Research: A Survey of Scientific Agents

Путеводитель автостопщика по автономным исследованиям: обзор научных агентов
X. Wang, Jian Xu, Sheng Lian, Yi Chen, Hai‐Yang Guo, Fei Zhu, Yuanqi Shao, Minsi Ren, Huimin Yi, Aslan H. Feng, Hongming Yang, Tailin Wu, Han Hu, Shiming Xiang, Xu-Yao Zhang, Cheng‐Lin Liu
2026-01-01

AI for Science (AI4S)AWESOME_SCIENTIFIC_AGENTlarge language model agentsscientific agentsscientific research lifecycle
The advancement of LLM-based agents is redefining AI for Science (AI4S) by enabling autonomous scientific research. Prominent LLMs exhibited expertise across multiple domains, catalysing constructions of domain-specialised scientific agents. Nevertheless, the profound epistemic and methodological gaps between AI and the natural sciences still impede the systematic design, training, and validation of these agents. This survey bridges the existing gap by presenting a comprehensive blueprint for scientific agents' design. It first clarifies the concept of scientific agents and distinguishes them from general-purpose agents in terms of their goal orientation, workflow embedding, and scientific commitments. It then introduces a unified taxonomy based on capability envelope and capability maturity, characterizing both the scope of scientific workflow coverage and the reliability of agent behavior under realistic research conditions. Building on this taxonomy, the survey further connects scientific agent design with the research life cycle by reviewing construction strategies, capability enhancement methods, evaluation paradigms, and future challenges. This unified perspective aims to provide practical guidance for designing domain-specific scientific agents and to promote the convergence of AI research and natural scientific discovery. To support long-term progress, we curate a live repository (AWESOME_SCIENTIFIC_AGENT) that continuously aggregates emerging methods, benchmarks, and best practices.
1
A unified taxonomy characterizes scientific agents by capability envelope, covering workflow scope, and capability maturity, reflecting behavioral reliability under realistic research conditions.
2
Scientific agents are distinguished from general-purpose agents by goal orientation, integration into scientific workflows, and explicit scientific commitments.
3
The live AWESOME_SCIENTIFIC_AGENT repository continuously aggregates emerging methods, benchmarks, and best practices to support long-term progress.
4
The survey maps scientific-agent construction, capability enhancement, and evaluation strategies onto the full scientific research life cycle.
5
The survey provides a comprehensive blueprint for designing, training, evaluating, and advancing LLM-based scientific agents.

LLM-based scientific agents for autonomous research

Their design, taxonomy, capabilities, reliability, evaluation, and integration into the scientific research life cycle

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
X. Wang
Jian Xu
Sheng Lian
Yi Chen
Hai‐Yang Guo
Fei Zhu
Yuanqi Shao
Minsi Ren
Huimin Yi
Aslan H. Feng
Hongming Yang
Tailin Wu
Han Hu
Shiming Xiang
Xu-Yao Zhang
Cheng‐Lin Liu
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%