Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media
Систематический обзор литературы о распространении дезинформации, связанной со здоровьем, в социальных сетях
2019-09-18
SCID: 54.1/jgzyekd2
Discuss with AI
content analysishealth-related misinformationsocial mediasocial network analysissystematic literature review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Contemporary commentators describe the current period as "an era of fake news" in which misinformation, generated intentionally or unintentionally, spreads rapidly. Although affecting all areas of life, it poses particular problems in the health arena, where it can delay or prevent effective care, in some cases threatening the lives of individuals. While examples of the rapid spread of misinformation date back to the earliest days of scientific medicine, the internet, by allowing instantaneous communication and powerful amplification has brought about a quantum change. In democracies where ideas compete in the marketplace for attention, accurate scientific information, which may be difficult to comprehend and even dull, is easily crowded out by sensationalized news. In order to uncover the current evidence and better understand the mechanism of misinformation spread, we report a systematic review of the nature and potential drivers of health-related misinformation. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus and Google databases to identify relevant methodological and empirical articles published between 2012 and 2018. A total of 57 articles were included for full-text analysis. Overall, we observe an increasing trend in published articles on health-related misinformation and the role of social media in its propagation. The most extensively studied topics involving misinformation relate to vaccination, Ebola and Zika Virus, although others, such as nutrition, cancer, fluoridation of water and smoking also featured. Studies adopted theoretical frameworks from psychology and network science, while co-citation analysis revealed potential for greater collaboration across fields. Most studies employed content analysis, social network analysis or experiments, drawing on disparate disciplinary paradigms. Future research should examine susceptibility of different sociodemographic groups to misinformation and understand the role of belief systems on the intention to spread misinformation. Further interdisciplinary research is also warranted to identify effective and tailored interventions to counter the spread of health-related misinformation online.
Key Findings
1
A systematic review identified 57 methodological and empirical articles on health-related misinformation published between 2012 and 2018.
2
Additional misinformation research addressed nutrition, cancer, water fluoridation, and smoking, indicating coverage across diverse health domains.
3
Published research on health-related misinformation and social media propagation is increasing, with vaccination, Ebola, and Zika being the most studied topics.
4
Studies primarily used content analysis, social network analysis, and experiments, drawing on psychology and network-science frameworks across disparate disciplines.
5
The review identifies a need to study sociodemographic susceptibility to misinformation and how belief systems influence intentions related to misinformation.
Research Object
Health-related misinformation on social media
Research Subject
The nature and potential drivers of the spread and propagation of health-related misinformation
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-09-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
The spreading of misinformation online2016
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science2013
The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technology-Based Health Behaviour Change or Disease Management Interventions for Health Care Consumers: A Systematic Review2013
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009