A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models

Обзор методов оценки больших языковых моделей
Yue Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Yi Chang, Qiang Yang, Xing Xie
2024-01-23

AI ethicsLLM evaluationevaluation benchmarkslarge language modelsreasoning evaluation
Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry, owing to their unprecedented performance in various applications. As LLMs continue to play a vital role in both research and daily use, their evaluation becomes increasingly critical, not only at the task level, but also at the society level for better understanding of their potential risks. Over the past years, significant efforts have been made to examine LLMs from various perspectives. This paper presents a comprehensive review of these evaluation methods for LLMs, focusing on three key dimensions: what to evaluate , where to evaluate , and how to evaluate . Firstly, we provide an overview from the perspective of evaluation tasks, encompassing general natural language processing tasks, reasoning, medical usage, ethics, education, natural and social sciences, agent applications, and other areas. Secondly, we answer the ‘where’ and ‘how’ questions by diving into the evaluation methods and benchmarks, which serve as crucial components in assessing the performance of LLMs. Then, we summarize the success and failure cases of LLMs in different tasks. Finally, we shed light on several future challenges that lie ahead in LLMs evaluation. Our aim is to offer invaluable insights to researchers in the realm of LLMs evaluation, thereby aiding the development of more proficient LLMs. Our key point is that evaluation should be treated as an essential discipline to better assist the development of LLMs. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at: https://github.com/MLGroupJLU/LLM-eval-survey
1
It reviews evaluation tasks spanning general NLP, reasoning, medicine, ethics, education, natural and social sciences, and agent applications.
2
It summarizes both successful and failed LLM applications, highlighting the importance of understanding capabilities alongside limitations and risks.
3
The paper examines evaluation methods and benchmarks as central components for assessing LLM performance across diverse settings.
4
The survey identifies future challenges and argues that LLM evaluation should become an essential discipline supporting the development of more proficient models.
5
The survey organizes LLM evaluation around three dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.

Large language models (LLMs)

evaluation of LLMs across tasks, domains, methods, benchmarks, and societal risks

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-01-23
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
2771
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yue Zhang
Philip S. Yu
Yupeng Chang
Xu Wang
Jindong Wang
Yuan Wu
Linyi Yang
Kaijie Zhu
Hao Chen
Xiaoyuan Yi
Cunxiang Wang
Yidong Wang
Wei Ye
Yi Chang
Qiang Yang
Xing Xie
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%