The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
Роль ChatGPT в высшем образовании: преимущества, проблемы и направления будущих исследований
2023-05-11
SCID: 54.1/kkcnebtt
Discuss with AI
AI bias and misinformationAI literacyChatGPTacademic integrityadaptive learningassessment strategiesautomated administrative servicesconstructivist theory of learninggraduate skill developmenthigher educationinnovative assessmentspersonalised feedback
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper examines the potential benefits and challenges of using the generative AI model, ChatGPT, in higher education, in the backdrop of the constructivist theory of learning. This perspective-type study presents five benefits of ChatGPT: the potential to facilitate adaptive learning, provide personalised feedback, support research and data analysis, offer automated administrative services, and aid in developing innovative assessments. Additionally, the paper identifies five challenges: academic integrity concerns, reliability issues, inability to evaluate and reinforce graduate skill sets, limitations in assessing learning outcomes, and potential biases and falsified information in information processing. The paper argues that tertiary educators and students must exercise caution when using ChatGPT for academic purposes to ensure its ethical, reliable, and effective use. To achieve this, the paper proposes various propositions, such as prioritising education on the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT, devising new assessment strategies, addressing bias and falsified information, and including AI literacy as part of graduate skills. By balancing the potential benefits and challenges, ChatGPT can enhance students’ learning experiences in higher education.
Key Findings
1
ChatGPT can aid in developing innovative assessments for higher education curricula.
2
ChatGPT can facilitate adaptive learning in higher education by tailoring learning experiences to individual students.
3
ChatGPT can offer automated administrative services that may streamline institutional processes.
4
ChatGPT can provide personalized feedback to students, supporting individualized instruction and improvement.
5
ChatGPT can support research and data analysis tasks for higher education stakeholders.
6
ChatGPT has limitations in evaluating and reinforcing graduate skill sets and in assessing learning outcomes.
7
ChatGPT presents reliability issues, including potential biases and falsified information in outputs.
8
The paper proposes devising new assessment strategies and addressing bias and misinformation to enable ethical, reliable, and effective ChatGPT use.
9
The paper recommends educating students and educators on responsible, ethical ChatGPT use and including AI literacy in graduate skills.
10
Use of ChatGPT raises academic integrity concerns, including risks of misuse in student work.
Research Object
Use of the generative AI model ChatGPT in higher education
Research Subject
Benefits, challenges, and implications for teaching, learning, assessment, academic integrity, and AI literacy when integrating ChatGPT into tertiary education
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-05-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
553
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai6
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy2023
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns2023
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox2021
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?2023
War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education2023
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?2019