ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning

ChatGPT в высшем образовании: вопросы академической добросовестности и обучения студентов
Miriam Sullivan, Andrew Kelly, Paul McLaughlan
2023-03-20

ChatGPTacademic integritycontent analysisgenerative artificial intelligencehigher education
The release of ChatGPT has sparked significant academic integrity concerns in higher education. However, some commentators have pointed out that generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT can enhance student learning. Consequently, academics should adapt their teaching and assessment practices to embrace the new reality of living, working, and studying in a world where AI is freely available. Despite this important debate, very little academic literature has been published on ChatGPT and other generative AI tools. This article uses content analysis to examine news articles (N=100) about how ChatGPT is disrupting higher education, concentrating specifically on Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It explores several key themes, including university responses, academic integrity concerns, the limitations and weaknesses of AI tool outputs, and opportunities for student learning. The data reveals mixed public discussion and university responses, with a focus mainly on academic integrity concerns and opportunities for innovative assessment design. There has also been a lack of public discussion about the potential for ChatGPT to enhance participation and success for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Similarly, the students’ voice is poorly represented in media articles to date. This article considers these trends and the impact of AI tools on student learning at university.
1
Media coverage gives little attention to ChatGPT’s potential to improve participation and success among students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
2
Public discussion and university responses are mixed, focusing primarily on academic integrity concerns and opportunities for innovative assessment design.
3
Students’ perspectives are poorly represented in existing media discussions about ChatGPT in higher education.
4
The analysis highlights limitations and weaknesses in ChatGPT’s outputs alongside potential opportunities for enhancing student learning.
5
The article analyzes 100 news articles from Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom about ChatGPT’s disruption of higher education.

ChatGPT and other generative AI tools in higher education

Their impact on academic integrity, university teaching and assessment practices, and student learning

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-03-20
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
807
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Miriam Sullivan
Andrew Kelly
Paul McLaughlan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%