Agile project management with Scrum
Гибкое управление проектами со Scrum
2017-01-04
SCID: 54.1/mda2qezk
Discuss with AI
Agile project management (APM)Development time reductionScrumSoftware development case studyWaterfall model
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the benefits of the agile project management (APM) framework compared to the traditional waterfall model, and understand how it can help companies add value and gain competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used was the exploratory qualitative research through a case study of a software project, developed with the support and application of the Scrum framework, in a pharmaceutical industry information technology project. Findings There were benefits found in the utilization of the agile framework, such as increased motivation and staff satisfaction, better control of requirements and especially higher quality of the delivered system, generating added value to the organization. Additionally, the project allowed the use of features from the first month of the application deployed, enabling a 75 percent reduction in development time, compared to traditional methods. The software development time was four months, 30 percent of what would be the total if the traditional methodology was adopted. Based on the results, the agile framework, especially the Scrum, proved to be a viable option as a project management approach. Research limitations/implications Since this research is an exploratory case study, its results cannot be generalized. Practical implications The paper provides relevant practical information and experiences to managers interested in implementing APM, as well as those interested in improving the management of projects. Originality/value This paper provides a case study with practical implications of using APM, and APM’s benefits and advantages are compared with the traditional waterfall approach. Companies can use this case study to better understand about the advantages and strengths of APM over the traditional approach.
Key Findings
1
As evidenced by the case study, Scrum proved a viable agile project management option versus the waterfall model.
2
Features were available from the first month of deployment, enabling early use of the application.
3
Results are from an exploratory case study and cannot be generalized broadly.
4
Scrum implementation improved control of requirements and delivered higher quality software, adding organizational value.
5
The project achieved a 75 percent reduction in development time compared to traditional methods.
6
Total software development time was four months, which is 30 percent of the time estimated under the traditional methodology.
7
Use of Scrum in a pharmaceutical IT project increased team motivation and staff satisfaction.
Research Object
A software project in a pharmaceutical industry's IT department developed using the Scrum-based Agile Project Management framework
Research Subject
Benefits and impacts of using the Scrum-based Agile Project Management framework versus the traditional waterfall model, including development time reduction, quality of delivered system, requirements control, and team motivation/satisfaction
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-01-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest