Global Carbon Budget 2022

Глобальный углеродный бюджет 2022 года
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O’Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, R. A. Houghton, G. C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O’Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Dolores Arbelo Rodríguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright
2022-11-08

Anthropogenic CO2 emissionsCarbon budget imbalanceGlobal carbon budgetOcean CO2 sinkTerrestrial CO2 sink
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO 2 emissions ( E FOS ) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change ( E LUC ), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO 2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate ( G ATM ) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO 2 sink ( S OCEAN ) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO 2 sink ( S LAND ) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance ( B IM ), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1 σ . For the year 2021, E FOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E LUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr −1 , for a total anthropogenic CO 2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr −1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO 2 ). Also, for 2021, G ATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr −1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr −1 ), S OCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr −1 , and S LAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr −1 , with a B IM of −0.6 GtC yr −1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO 2 concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in E FOS relative to 2021 of +1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %) globally and atmospheric CO 2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr −1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO 2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO 2 flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).
1
Global atmospheric CO2 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm in 2021; the carbon-budget imbalance was −0.6 GtC yr−1, indicating imperfect data or understanding of the carbon cycle.
2
In 2021, fossil CO2 emissions increased 5.1% from 2020, reaching 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, or 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 including cement carbonation.
3
The 2021 carbon sinks absorbed 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1 in oceans and 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1 on land, while atmospheric CO2 growth was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1.
4
The paper synthesizes datasets and methodologies for quantifying five major global carbon-budget components and their uncertainties.
5
Total anthropogenic CO2 emissions in 2021 were 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1, equivalent to 40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO2.

The global carbon cycle and its five major components: fossil CO2 emissions, land-use-change emissions, atmospheric CO2, ocean CO2 uptake, and terrestrial CO2 uptake

Quantification of the magnitude and uncertainties of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, carbon redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, and the resulting carbon-budget imbalance

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-11-08
Journal
Earth system science data
Publisher
Copernicus Publications
ISSN
1866-3508
Cited by
1898
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Pierre Friedlingstein
Michael O’Sullivan
Matthew W. Jones
Robbie M. Andrew
Luke Gregor
Judith Hauck
Corinne Le Quéré
Ingrid T. Luijkx
Are Olsen
Glen P. Peters
Wouter Peters
Julia Pongratz
Clemens Schwingshackl
Stephen Sitch
Josep G. Canadell
Philippe Ciais
Robert B. Jackson
Simone R. Alin
Ramdane Alkama
Almut Arneth
Vivek Arora
Nicholas R. Bates
Meike Becker
Nicolas Bellouin
Henry C. Bittig
Laurent Bopp
Frédéric Chevallier
Louise Chini
Margot Cronin
Wiley Evans
Stefanie Falk
Richard A. Feely
Thomas Gasser
Marion Gehlen
Thanos Gkritzalis
Lucas Gloege
Giacomo Grassi
Nicolas Gruber
Özgür Gürses
Ian Harris
Matthew Hefner
R. A. Houghton
G. C. Hurtt
Yosuke Iida
Tatiana Ilyina
Atul K. Jain
Annika Jersild
Koji Kadono
Etsushi Kato
Daniel Kennedy
Kees Klein Goldewijk
Jürgen Knauer
Jan Ivar Korsbakken
Peter Landschützer
Nathalie Lefèvre
Keith Lindsay
Junjie Liu
Zhu Liu
Gregg Marland
Nicolas Mayot
Matthew J. McGrath
Nicolas Metzl
Natalie Monacci
David R. Munro
Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka
Yosuke Niwa
Kevin O’Brien
Tsuneo Ono
Paul I. Palmer
Naiqing Pan
Denis Pierrot
Katie Pocock
Benjamin Poulter
Laure Resplandy
Eddy Robertson
Christian Rödenbeck
Carmen Dolores Arbelo Rodríguez
Thais M. Rosan
Jörg Schwinger
Roland Séférian
Jamie D. Shutler
Ingunn Skjelvan
Tobias Steinhoff
Qing Sun
Adrienne J. Sutton
Colm Sweeney
Shintaro Takao
Toste Tanhua
Pieter P. Tans
Xiangjun Tian
Hanqin Tian
Bronte Tilbrook
Hiroyuki Tsujino
Francesco N. Tubiello
Guido R. van der Werf
Anthony P. Walker
Rik Wanninkhof
Chris Whitehead
Anna Willstrand Wranne
Rebecca Wright
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%