Global Carbon Budget 2020

Глобальный углеродный бюджет 2020
Zhu Liu, Philippe Ciais, Gregg Marland, Glen P. Peters, Thomas Gasser, Xu Yue, Benjamin Poulter, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Gruber, Robert B. Jackson, Jörg Schwinger, Pierre Friedlingstein, Wenping Yuan, Hanqin Tian, Stephen Sitch, Naveen Chandra, Laurent Bopp, Corinne Le Quéré, R. A. Houghton, Sönke Zaehle, Pieter P. Tans, Josep G. Canadell, Nicolas Metzl, Guido R. van der Werf, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Almut Arneth, Wouter Peters, Frédéric Chevallier, Nicolas Vuichard, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Louise Chini, Anthony P. Walker, Christian Rödenbeck, Michael O’Sullivan, Yosuke Niwa, Andrew Watson, Toste Tanhua, Laure Resplandy, Matthew W. Jones, Tatiana Ilyina, Piers Forster, Adrienne J. Sutton, Ian Harris, Julia Pongratz, Judith Hauck, Paul I. Palmer, Robbie M. Andrew, Meike Becker, Marion Gehlen, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Vanessa Haverd, Émilie Joetzjer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Eddy Robertson, Roland Séférian, Bronte Tilbrook, A. Wiltshire, Rik Wanninkhof, Are Olsen, Henry C. Bittig, Simone R. Alin, Vivek Arora, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Selma Bultan, Wiley Evans, Liesbeth Florentie, Luke Gregor, Kerstin Hartung, Koji Kadono, Vassilis Kitidis, Kevin O’Brien, Ingunn Skjelvan, Adam J. P. Smith, David Willis, Koji Kadono
2020-12-10

anthropogenic CO2 emissionscarbon cycleglobal carbon budgetocean CO2 sinkterrestrial CO2 sink
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO 2 emissions ( E FOS ) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change ( E LUC ), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO 2 concentration is measured directly and its growth rate ( G ATM ) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO 2 sink ( S OCEAN ) and terrestrial CO 2 sink ( S LAND ) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance ( B IM ), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1 σ . For the last decade available (2010–2019), E FOS was 9.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E LUC was 1.6 ± 0.7 GtC yr −1 . For the same decade, G ATM was 5.1 ± 0.02 GtC yr −1 (2.4 ± 0.01 ppm yr −1 ), S OCEAN 2.5 ± 0.6 GtC yr −1 , and S LAND 3.4 ± 0.9 GtC yr −1 , with a budget imbalance B IM of −0.1 GtC yr −1 indicating a near balance between estimated sources and sinks over the last decade. For the year 2019 alone, the growth in E FOS was only about 0.1 % with fossil emissions increasing to 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.7 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 when cement carbonation sink is included), and E LUC was 1.8 ± 0.7 GtC yr −1 , for total anthropogenic CO 2 emissions of 11.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr −1 (42.2 ± 3.3 GtCO 2 ). Also for 2019, G ATM was 5.4 ± 0.2 GtC yr −1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr −1 ), S OCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.6 GtC yr −1 , and S LAND was 3.1 ± 1.2 GtC yr −1 , with a B IM of 0.3 GtC. The global atmospheric CO 2 concentration reached 409.85 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2019. Preliminary data for 2020, accounting for the COVID-19-induced changes in emissions, suggest a decrease in E FOS relative to 2019 of about −7 % (median estimate) based on individual estimates from four studies of −6 %, −7 %, −7 % (−3 % to −11 %), and −13 %. Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2019, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr −1 persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO 2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from diverse approaches and observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land-use change emissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO 2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent discrepancy between the different methods for the ocean sink outside the tropics, particularly in the Southern Ocean. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Friedlingstein et al., 2019; Le Quéré et al., 2018b, a, 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2020 (Friedlingstein et al., 2020).
1
During 2010–2019, fossil CO₂ emissions averaged 9.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, or 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹ including cement carbonation.
2
From 2010–2019, the atmosphere, ocean, and land absorbed 5.1, 2.5, and 3.4 GtC yr⁻¹, respectively, with stated uncertainties.
3
Land-use change emissions averaged 1.6 ± 0.7 GtC yr⁻¹ during 2010–2019.
4
The budget imbalance was −0.1 GtC yr⁻¹ over 2010–2019, indicating near balance between estimated carbon sources and sinks; fossil emissions grew only about 0.1% in 2019.
5
The study synthesizes datasets and methodologies for quantifying five major global carbon-budget components and their uncertainties.

The global carbon budget, including anthropogenic CO2 emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere

Quantification of the five major carbon-budget components, their uncertainties, and the resulting imbalance in the contemporary global carbon cycle

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-12-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
2572
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Zhu Liu
Philippe Ciais
Gregg Marland
Glen P. Peters
Thomas Gasser
Xu Yue
Benjamin Poulter
Nicholas R. Bates
Nicolas Gruber
Robert B. Jackson
Jörg Schwinger
Pierre Friedlingstein
Wenping Yuan
Hanqin Tian
Stephen Sitch
Naveen Chandra
Laurent Bopp
Corinne Le Quéré
R. A. Houghton
Sönke Zaehle
Pieter P. Tans
Josep G. Canadell
Nicolas Metzl
Guido R. van der Werf
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão
Almut Arneth
Wouter Peters
Frédéric Chevallier
Nicolas Vuichard
Atul K. Jain
Etsushi Kato
Louise Chini
Anthony P. Walker
Christian Rödenbeck
Michael O’Sullivan
Yosuke Niwa
Andrew Watson
Toste Tanhua
Laure Resplandy
Matthew W. Jones
Tatiana Ilyina
Piers Forster
Adrienne J. Sutton
Ian Harris
Julia Pongratz
Judith Hauck
Paul I. Palmer
Robbie M. Andrew
Meike Becker
Marion Gehlen
Dennis Gilfillan
Thanos Gkritzalis
Vanessa Haverd
Émilie Joetzjer
Jan Ivar Korsbakken
Peter Landschützer
Nathalie Lefèvre
Andrew Lenton
Sebastian Lienert
Danica Lombardozzi
David R. Munro
Julia E. M. S. Nabel
Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka
Tsuneo Ono
Denis Pierrot
Eddy Robertson
Roland Séférian
Bronte Tilbrook
A. Wiltshire
Rik Wanninkhof
Are Olsen
Henry C. Bittig
Simone R. Alin
Vivek Arora
Alice Benoit-Cattin
Selma Bultan
Wiley Evans
Liesbeth Florentie
Luke Gregor
Kerstin Hartung
Koji Kadono
Vassilis Kitidis
Kevin O’Brien
Ingunn Skjelvan
Adam J. P. Smith
David Willis
Koji Kadono
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%