What is the evidence for the impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being: a scoping review and evidence-based logic model to guide healthcare strategy decision making on the use of gardening approaches as a social prescription
Какие доказательства существования влияния садов и садоводства на здоровье и благополучие: обзор объёма исследований и основанная на доказательствах логическая модель для руководства принятия решений в области стратегии здравоохранения по использованию садоводческих подходов в качестве социальной рецептуры
2020-07-01
SCID: 54.1/rfetsrrv
Discuss with AI
gardens and gardeninghealth and well-beinglogic modellong-term conditionssocial prescription
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and describe studies that have evaluated the impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being. A secondary objective was to use this evidence to build evidence-based logic models to guide health strategy decision making about gardens and gardening as a non-medical, social prescription. DESIGN: Scoping review of the impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being. Gardens include private spaces and those open to the public or part of hospitals, care homes, hospices or third sector organisations. DATA SOURCES: A range of biomedical and health management journals was searched including Medline, CINAHL, Psychinfo, Web of Knowledge, ASSIA, Cochrane, Joanna Briggs, Greenfile, Environment Complete and a number of indicative websites were searched to locate context-specific data and grey literature. We searched from 1990 to November 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included research studies (including systematic reviews) that assessed the effect, value or impact of any garden that met the gardening definition. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three reviewers jointly screened 50 records by titles and abstracts to ensure calibration. Each record title was screened independently by 2 out of 3 members of the project team and each abstract was screened by 1 member of a team of 3. Random checks on abstract and full-text screening were conducted by a fourth member of the team and any discrepancies were resolved through double-checking and discussion. RESULTS: studies was included. Over 35 validated health, well-being and functional biometric outcome measures were reported. Interventions ranged from viewing gardens, taking part in gardening or undertaking therapeutic activities. The findings demonstrated links between gardens and improved mental well-being, increased physical activity and a reduction in social isolation enabling the development of 2 logic models. CONCLUSIONS: Gardens and gardening can improve the health and well-being for people with a range of health and social needs. The benefits of gardens and gardening could be used as a 'social prescription' globally, for people with long-term conditions (LTCs). Our logic models provide an evidence-based illustration that can guide health strategy decision making about the referral of people with LTCs to socially prescribed, non-medical interventions involving gardens and gardening.
Key Findings
1
Authors developed two evidence-based logic models to guide healthcare strategy and social prescription referrals for people with long-term conditions.
2
Evidence demonstrated links between gardens/gardening and improved mental well-being, increased physical activity, and reduced social isolation.
3
Interventions studied ranged from viewing gardens to active gardening and therapeutic gardening activities.
4
Over 35 validated health, well-being, and biometric outcome measures were reported across included studies.
5
Scoping review identified studies (from 1990–Nov 2019) evaluating gardens and gardening impacts on health and well-being.
Research Object
Gardens and gardening interventions (including private, public, hospital, care-home, hospice and third-sector gardens)
Research Subject
Impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being, including mental well-being, physical activity, social isolation reduction and related validated health, well-being and functional biometric outcomes to inform evidence-based logic models for social prescription
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach2018
Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence2017
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation2007