Does Visual Training Enhance Athletes' Decision‐Making Skills and Sport‐Specific Performance? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Улучшает ли визуальная тренировка навыки принятия решений и видовую спортивную производительность у спортсменов? Систематический обзор и метаанализ
Yuqiang Guo, Chao Chen, Peng Jian, Liwei Deng, Tinggang Yuan
2025-10-01

decision-making response timemeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialssport-specific performancevisual training
ABSTRACT This study aims to systematically evaluate the impact of visual training (VT) on athletes' decision‐making skills and sport‐specific performance, while assessing the moderating effects of participant‐ and training‐related factors. A systematic literature search was conducted across Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus, with the search limited to publications available as of January, 2025. Only randomized controlled trials with baseline and follow‐up measures were included if they examined the effects of VT on at least one measure of decision‐making skills and sport‐specific performance in healthy athletes. The search yielded 3435 articles, of which 27 studies involving 669 participants met the inclusion criteria for meta‐analysis. The results revealed that VT significantly improved decision‐making response time (SMD = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.45–1.24]; I 2 = 30%; p < 0.01) and sport‐specific performance (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = [0.13–0.85]; I 2 = 61%; p = 0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed that no statistically significant differences were observed across groups, either based on participant characteristics or training protocols. However, trends in effect sizes and significance levels indicate that VT exhibited a slight advantage in some subgroups, suggesting that individual differences and training design may partially modulate its effects. VT demonstrates considerable potential as a supplementary training intervention, effectively enhancing response time and sport‐specific performance in athletes. Future research should focus on extending intervention periods and refining training protocols to further elucidate VT's long‐term benefits and its applicability across different athlete populations. Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024568547
1
Authors recommend future research with longer intervention periods and refined training protocols to clarify VT's long-term benefits and applicability across athlete populations.
2
Subgroup analyses found no statistically significant differences across participant characteristics or training protocols, though trends suggest slight subgroup advantages.
3
VT shows considerable potential as a supplementary training intervention to enhance response time and sport-specific performance in athletes.
4
VT significantly enhanced sport-specific performance (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = [0.13–0.85]; I2 = 61%; p = 0.01).
5
Visual training (VT) significantly improved athletes' decision-making response time (SMD = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.45–1.24]; I2 = 30%; p < 0.01).

Visual training (VT) interventions applied to healthy athletes

Effects of visual training on athletes' decision-making skills (response time) and sport-specific performance, including moderation by participant- and training-related factors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-10-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
10
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yuqiang Guo
Chao Chen
Peng Jian
Liwei Deng
Tinggang Yuan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%