Decoding academic integrity policies: A corpus linguistics investigation of AI and other technological threats

Декодирование политик академической добросовестности: корпусолингвистическое исследование ИИ и иных технологических угроз
Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe
2023-06-06

Automated Paraphrasing ToolsGenerative-AITechnological Explicitnessacademic integrity policiescorpus linguistics
NOTE: THIS PAPER IS NOW PUBLISHED THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41307-023-00323-2. THE PRESENT TEXT IS THAT ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION. This study provides a corpus analysis of academic integrity policies from Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) worldwide, exploring how they address the emerging issues posed by novel technological threats, such as Automated Paraphrasing Tools (APTs) and Generative-Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools, such as ChatGPT. The analysis of 142 policies conducted in both November 2022 and May 2023 revealed a significant gap regarding the mention of AI and associated technologies in publicly available academic integrity policies. Despite the growing prevalence of these tools in the six-month period since the release of ChatGPT, no HEIs have produced a revised academic integrity policy. Content analysis of 53 guidance documents produced by HEIs suggests an overall positive perception of Gen-AI tools, with a note of caution. This study suggests a modification to Bretag's (2011) exemplary academic integrity model by introducing "Technological Explicitness”, emphasizing the need to include explicit guidelines about new technologies in academic integrity policies. The results underscore the urgent need for HEIs to revise their academic integrity policies, considering the evolving landscape of AI and its implications for academic integrity. This paper argues for a multifaceted approach to deal with the issues of integrating technology, education, policy reform, and assessment restructuring to navigate these challenges while upholding academic integrity.
1
Authors propose adding "Technological Explicitness" to Bretag's (2011) academic integrity model to mandate explicit guidance on new technologies.
2
Content analysis of 53 HEI guidance documents shows an overall positive but cautious perception of Generative-AI tools.
3
Corpus analysis of 142 HEI academic integrity policies (Nov 2022 and May 2023) revealed a significant absence of explicit mention of AI and related technologies.
4
No HEIs produced a revised academic integrity policy addressing Gen-AI tools in the six months following ChatGPT's release.
5
The study concludes HEIs urgently need to revise policies and adopt a multifaceted strategy (technology, education, policy, assessment) to address AI-related integrity challenges.

Academic integrity policies of higher education institutions (HEIs)

How these policies address emerging technological threats—specifically Automated Paraphrasing Tools (APTs) and Generative AI (Gen-AI) tools like ChatGPT—including presence/absence of explicit guidance, content gaps, and proposed addition of "Technological Explicitness" to integrity models

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-06-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
13
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mike Perkins
Jasper Roe
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%