The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

Обновлённая консолидированная структура исследований внедрения на основе отзывов пользователей
Laura J. Damschroder, Julie C. Lowery, Caitlin M. Reardon, Marilla A. Opra Widerquist
2022-10-29

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Researchhealth equity in implementationimplementation determinantsimplementation sciencesystematic literature review
BACKGROUND: Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this project was to elicit feedback from experienced CFIR users to inform updates to the framework. METHODS: User feedback was obtained from two sources: (1) a literature review with a systematic search; and (2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 376 articles that contained the CFIR in the title and/or abstract and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n = 134/334) of authors completed the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items (e.g., applicability, usability), but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR include revisions to existing domains and constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes address important critiques of the CFIR, including better centering innovation recipients and adding determinants to equity in implementation. CONCLUSION: The updates in the CFIR reflect feedback from a growing community of CFIR users. Although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency. We encourage users to continue critiquing the CFIR, facilitating the evolution of the framework as implementation science advances.
1
A systematic search identified 376 CFIR-related articles, including 59 that provided framework feedback, and surveyed 334 authors.
2
Forty percent of contacted CFIR study authors completed the survey, with respondents rating the framework positively for applicability and usability.
3
The updated CFIR better centers innovation recipients and incorporates determinants related to equity in implementation.
4
Updated constructs remain mappable to the original CFIR, supporting longitudinal consistency while enabling continued framework evolution.
5
User feedback led to revisions of existing CFIR domains and constructs, alongside additions, removals, and relocations of constructs.

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

user-informed updates to the CFIR, including revisions, addition, removal, and relocation of domains and constructs to improve contextual determinant assessment and equity in implementation

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-10-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
4323
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Laura J. Damschroder
Julie C. Lowery
Caitlin M. Reardon
Marilla A. Opra Widerquist
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%