Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond

Прогресс и современное состояние гидрометаллургической и прямой переработки литий-ионных аккумуляторов и перспективы дальнейшего развития
Karim Zaghib, George P. Demopoulos, Farouk Tedjar, François Larouche, Kamyab Amouzegar, Georges Houlachi, Patrick Bouchard
2020-02-10

direct recyclinghydrometallurgical recyclinglithium iron phosphatelithium-ion batteriessulfate-based leaching
An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches.
1
Although LFP batteries are not dominant in the market, their increasing presence in waste streams creates technical challenges that can reduce recycling profitability.
2
Existing recycling projects primarily recover nickel, cobalt, manganese, and limited lithium, while often wasting iron phosphate from lithium iron phosphate batteries.
3
Rapid LIB market growth has created an urgent need for recycling methods compatible with sustainable development beyond conventional pyrometallurgy.
4
Sulfate-based leaching is currently the only large-scale hydrometallurgical LIB recycling method and underpins several pilot and demonstration projects.
5
The review evaluates alternative approaches, including selective leaching processes and direct recycling, to address limitations of current LIB recycling technologies.

end-of-life lithium-ion batteries and their recycling processes

the progress, status, and sustainability of hydrometallurgical and direct recycling approaches, including selective leaching and recovery limitations for LFP batteries

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-02-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
418
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Karim Zaghib
George P. Demopoulos
Farouk Tedjar
François Larouche
Kamyab Amouzegar
Georges Houlachi
Patrick Bouchard
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%