Industrial Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries—A Critical Review of Metallurgical Process Routes

Промышленная переработка литий-ионных аккумуляторов — критический обзор металлургических технологических маршрутов
Lisa Brückner, Julia Frank, Tobias Elwert
2020-08-18

hydrometallurgylithium-ion battery recyclingmechanical processingmetallurgical process routespyrometallurgy
Research for the recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) started about 15 years ago. In recent years, several processes have been realized in small-scale industrial plants in Europe, which can be classified into two major process routes. The first one combines pyrometallurgy with subsequent hydrometallurgy, while the second one combines mechanical processing, often after thermal pre-treatment, with metallurgical processing. Both process routes have a series of advantages and disadvantages with respect to legislative and health, safety and environmental requirements, possible recovery rates of the components, process robustness, and economic factors. This review critically discusses the current status of development, focusing on the metallurgical processing of LIB modules and cells. Although the main metallurgical process routes are defined, some issues remain unsolved. Most process routes achieve high yields for the valuable metals cobalt, copper, and nickel. In comparison, lithium is only recovered in few processes and with a lower yield, albeit a high economic value. The recovery of the low value components graphite, manganese, and electrolyte solvents is technically feasible but economically challenging. The handling of organic and halogenic components causes technical difficulties and high costs in all process routes. Therefore, further improvements need to be achieved to close the LIB loop before high amounts of LIB scrap return.
1
Both routes involve trade-offs concerning regulatory, health, safety, environmental, recovery, robustness, and economic requirements.
2
Industrial LIB recycling has converged on two main routes: pyrometallurgy followed by hydrometallurgy, or mechanical processing—often thermally pre-treated—followed by metallurgical processing.
3
Most processes achieve high recovery yields for valuable cobalt, copper, and nickel, whereas lithium recovery remains limited and generally lower despite lithium’s high economic value.
4
Organic and halogenic components create technical difficulties and high costs across all routes, leaving important issues unresolved before large-scale closed-loop LIB recycling is achieved.
5
Recovering graphite, manganese, and electrolyte solvents is technically feasible but economically challenging because these components have relatively low value.

industrial lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling processes for LIB modules and cells

metallurgical process routes, recovery yields, and technical, environmental, safety, legislative, and economic performance in recovering LIB components

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-08-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Lisa Brückner
Julia Frank
Tobias Elwert
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%