Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood

Присутствие микропластика и нанопластика в пищевых продуктах, с особым вниманием к морепродуктам
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
2016-06-01

analytical methodsfood safety risk assessmentmicroplastics in foodnanoplasticsseafood contamination
Following a request from the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), the EFSA Panel for Contaminants in the Food Chain was asked to deliver a statement on the presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. Primary microplastics are plastics originally manufactured to be that size, while secondary microplastics originate from fragmentation. Nanoplastics can originate from engineered material or can be produced during fragmentation of microplastic debris. Microplastics range from 0.1 to 5,000 μm and nanoplastics from approximately 1 to 100 nm (0.001-0.1 μm). There is no legislation for microplastics and nanoplastics as contaminants in food. Methods are available for identification and quantification of microplastics in food, including seafood. Occurrence data are limited. In contrast to microplastics no methods or occurrence data in food are available for nanoplastics. Microplastics can contain on average 4% of additives and the plastics can adsorb contaminants. Both additives and contaminants can be of organic as well of inorganic nature. Based on a conservative estimate the presence of microplastics in seafood would have a small effect on the overall exposure to additives or contaminants. Toxicity and toxicokinetic data are lacking for both microplastics and nanoplastics for a human risk assessment. It is recommended that analytical methods should be further developed for microplastics and developed for nanoplastics and standardised, in order to assess their presence, identity and to quantify their amount in food. Furthermore, quality assurance should be in place and demonstrated. For microplastics and nanoplastics, occurrence data in food, including effects of food processing, in particular, for the smaller sized particles (< 150 μm) should be generated. Research on the toxicokinetics and toxicity, including studies on local effects in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, are needed as is research on the degradation of microplastics and potential formation of nanoplastics in the human GI tract.
1
A conservative estimate indicates that microplastics in seafood make only a small contribution to overall human exposure to additives or contaminants.
2
Human risk assessment is currently constrained by insufficient toxicity and toxicokinetic data for both microplastics and nanoplastics.
3
Methods exist to identify and quantify microplastics in food, including seafood, but occurrence data remain limited and no methods or occurrence data are available for nanoplastics.
4
Microplastics contain approximately 4% additives on average and can adsorb organic and inorganic contaminants.
5
Microplastics in food range from 0.1 to 5,000 μm, whereas nanoplastics are approximately 1–100 nm in size.
6
Standardized, quality-assured analytical methods and additional occurrence, processing, toxicokinetic, and gastrointestinal toxicity data are needed, particularly for particles smaller than 150 μm.

Microplastics and nanoplastics in food, particularly seafood

Their presence, occurrence, identification, quantification, contaminant/additive content, exposure contribution, and potential toxicity and toxicokinetics

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-06-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
958
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%