Foreign direct investment along the Belt and Road: A political economy perspective
Прямые иностранные инвестиции вдоль «Пояса и пути»: политико-экономическая перспектива
2021-06-01
SCID: 54.1/wbrs4pdn
Discuss with AI
Belt and Road InitiativeChinese state-owned enterprisesforeign direct investmentgeopolitical bargainingpolitical economy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract In 2013, China launched its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a large portfolio of infrastructure projects across 71 countries intended to link Eurasian markets by rail and sea. The state-led nature of the Initiative combined with its transformative geopolitical implications have conditioned the type of engagement that many governments and firms in host and third countries are willing to take in Chinese-funded BRI projects. Building on two theoretical streams that have originated in international political economy but have received growing attention in international business, varieties of capitalism and geopolitics, this perspective shows how a greater understanding of the institutional and geopolitical context surrounding BRI helps decipher the selection of host-country firms and third-country MNEs in Chinese-funded BRI projects. We portray firm selection in a BRI project as the outcome of a one-tier bargaining game between China and a host country. We show how institutions and geopolitics influence both the legitimacy gap of Chinese SOEs in a host country and the host country’s relative bargaining power, affecting the likelihood that host firms and third-country MNEs are selected in BRI projects. We also discuss the geopolitical jockeying strategies that these firms can adopt to influence the outcome of the bargaining game.
Key Findings
1
Firm selection in BRI projects is conceptualized as a one-tier bargaining game between China and the host country.
2
Host firms and third-country MNEs can use geopolitical jockeying strategies to influence bargaining outcomes and their participation in BRI projects.
3
Institutional and geopolitical conditions influence the legitimacy gap of Chinese state-owned enterprises in host countries.
4
The Belt and Road Initiative’s state-led structure and geopolitical implications shape governments’ and firms’ willingness to participate in Chinese-funded projects.
5
These conditions also affect host-country bargaining power, thereby changing the likelihood that host firms and third-country multinationals are selected.
Research Object
Chinese-funded Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure projects and the participating host-country firms and third-country multinational enterprises
Research Subject
The influence of institutional and geopolitical context on the selection of host-country firms and third-country MNEs through China–host-country bargaining, including Chinese SOE legitimacy gaps and host-country bargaining power
Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-06-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
163
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest