Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Управление легитимностью: стратегические и институциональные подходы
1995-07-01
SCID: 54.1/dasqy99u
Discuss with AI
cognitive legitimacylegitimacy management strategiesmoral legitimacyorganizational legitimacypragmatic legitimacy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.
Key Findings
1
Different strategies exist for gaining, maintaining, and repairing each type of legitimacy.
2
Instrumental manipulations to manage legitimacy offer both promises (potential effectiveness) and pitfalls (risks and limitations).
3
Organizational legitimacy literature can be synthesized into two leading approaches: strategic and institutional.
4
Strategic and institutional approaches show both similarities and disparities in how they conceptualize and address legitimacy.
5
There are three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic (audience self-interest), moral (normative approval), and cognitive (comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness).
Research Object
Organizational legitimacy (pragmatic, moral, and cognitive forms)
Research Subject
Strategies and institutional approaches for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy, including promises and pitfalls of instrumental manipulations across the three legitimacy types
Publication Details
Publication Date
1995-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest