Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives

Генеративный ИИ и будущее высшего образования: угроза академической честности или реформа? Данные с мультикультурных перспектив
Abdullahi Yusuf, Nasrin Pervin, ‪Marcos Román-González‬
2024-03-24

academic integrityethical guidelinesgenerative Artificial Intelligencehigher educationmulticultural perspectives
Abstract In recent years, higher education (HE) globally has witnessed extensive adoption of technology, particularly in teaching and research. The emergence of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) further accelerates this trend. However, the increasing sophistication of GenAI tools has raised concerns about their potential to automate teaching and research processes. Despite widespread research on GenAI in various fields, there is a lack of multicultural perspectives on its impact and concerns in HE. This study addresses this gap by examining the usage, benefits, and concerns of GenAI in higher education from a multicultural standpoint. We employed an online survey that collected responses from 1217 participants across 76 countries, encompassing a broad range of gender categories, academic disciplines, geographical locations, and cultural orientations. Our findings revealed a high level of awareness and familiarity with GenAI tools among respondents. A significant portion had prior experience and expressed the intention to continue using these tools, primarily for information retrieval and text paraphrasing. The study emphasizes the importance of GenAI integration in higher education, highlighting both its potential benefits and concerns. Notably, there is a strong correlation between cultural dimensions and respondents’ views on the benefits and concerns related to GenAI, including its potential as academic dishonesty and the need for ethical guidelines. We, therefore, argued that responsible use of GenAI tools can enhance learning processes, but addressing concerns may require robust policies that are responsive to cultural expectations. We discussed the findings and offered recommendations for researchers, educators, and policymakers, aiming to promote the ethical and effective integration of GenAI tools in higher education.
1
A significant portion of respondents have prior GenAI experience and intend to continue using these tools, primarily for information retrieval and text paraphrasing.
2
Responsible integration of GenAI can enhance learning processes, but addressing concerns requires robust, culturally responsive policies.
3
Survey of 1,217 participants from 76 countries shows high awareness and familiarity with generative AI tools in higher education.
4
The study fills a multicultural perspective gap and provides recommendations for researchers, educators, and policymakers on ethical GenAI integration in higher education.
5
There is a strong correlation between cultural dimensions and views on GenAI benefits and concerns, including perceptions of academic dishonesty and need for ethical guidelines.

Use of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in higher education across multicultural contexts

Perceived usage patterns, benefits, concerns (including academic dishonesty), cultural influences on attitudes, and policy/ethical implications for integrating GenAI into higher education

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-03-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
498
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Abdullahi Yusuf
Nasrin Pervin
‪Marcos Román-González‬
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%