Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Изучение естественно-научного образования с помощью ChatGPT: поисковое исследование генеративного искусственного интеллекта
Grant Cooper
2023-03-22

AI ethicsChatGPTgenerative artificial intelligencescience educationself-study methodology
Abstract The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential in the field of education. The study explores three main areas: (1) How did ChatGPT answer questions related to science education? (2) What are some ways educators could utilise ChatGPT in their science pedagogy? and (3) How has ChatGPT been utilised in this study, and what are my reflections about its use as a research tool? This exploratory research applies a self-study methodology to investigate the technology. Impressively, ChatGPT’s output often aligned with key themes in the research. However, as it currently stands, ChatGPT runs the risk of positioning itself as the ultimate epistemic authority, where a single truth is assumed without a proper grounding in evidence or presented with sufficient qualifications. Key ethical concerns associated with AI include its potential environmental impact, issues related to content moderation, and the risk of copyright infringement. It is important for educators to model responsible use of ChatGPT, prioritise critical thinking, and be clear about expectations. ChatGPT is likely to be a useful tool for educators designing science units, rubrics, and quizzes. Educators should critically evaluate any AI-generated resource and adapt it to their specific teaching contexts. ChatGPT was used as a research tool for assistance with editing and to experiment with making the research narrative clearer. The intention of the paper is to act as a catalyst for a broader conversation about the use of generative AI in science education.
1
ChatGPT may present itself as an ultimate epistemic authority by implying a single truth without sufficient evidence or qualification.
2
ChatGPT’s responses to science-education questions often aligned with key themes identified in the exploratory self-study.
3
Educators could use ChatGPT to help design science units, rubrics, and quizzes, but should critically evaluate and contextualize all generated materials.
4
In this study, ChatGPT supported editing and experimentation with clearer research narration, while prompting broader reflection on generative AI in science education.
5
Responsible classroom use requires educators to model critical thinking, clarify expectations, and address environmental, content-moderation, and copyright concerns.

ChatGPT as a generative artificial intelligence tool in science education

ChatGPT’s responses, pedagogical uses, research-tool use, and associated educational and ethical implications

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-03-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1235
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Grant Cooper
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%