Microplastic contamination of drinking water: A systematic review
Загрязнение питьевой воды микропластиком: систематический обзор
2020-07-31
SCID: 54.1/xn5ueqev
Discuss with AI
drinking waterhuman exposuremicroplastic contaminationrisk of bias assessmentsystematic review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Microplastics (MPs) are omnipresent in the environment, including the human food chain; a likely important contributor to human exposure is drinking water. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review of MP contamination of drinking water and estimate quantitative exposures. METHODS: The protocol for the systematic review employed has been published in PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2019, Registration number: CRD42019145290). MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from launch to the 3rd of June 2020, selecting studies that used procedural blank samples and a validated method for particle composition analysis. Studies were reviewed within a narrative analysis. A bespoke risk of bias (RoB) assessment tool was used. RESULTS: 12 studies were included in the review: six of tap water (TW) and six of bottled water (BW). Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to high statistical heterogeneity (I2>95%). Seven studies were rated low RoB and all confirmed MP contamination of drinking water. The most common polymers identified in samples were polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP), Methodological variability was observed throughout the experimental protocols. For example, the minimum size of particles extracted and analysed, which varied from 1 to 100 μm, was seen to be critical in the data reported. The maximum reported MP contamination was 628 MPs/L for TW and 4889 MPs/L for BW, detected in European samples. Based on typical consumption data, this may be extrapolated to a maximum yearly human adult uptake of 458,000 MPs for TW and 3,569,000 MPs for BW. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review that appraises the quality of existing evidence on MP contamination of drinking water and estimates human exposures. The precautionary principle should be adopted to address concerns on possible human health effects from consumption of MPs. Future research should aim to standardise experimental protocols to aid comparison and elevate quality.
Key Findings
1
All seven studies assessed as having low risk of bias confirmed microplastic contamination in drinking water.
2
Estimated maximum annual adult uptake was 458,000 microplastics from tap water and 3,569,000 from bottled water based on typical consumption.
3
Methodological heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis; particle-size thresholds from 1 to 100 μm substantially influenced reported contamination levels.
4
Polyethylene terephthalate and polypropylene were the most frequently identified polymers in drinking-water samples.
5
Reported contamination reached 628 microplastics/L in tap water and 4,889 microplastics/L in bottled water, with maxima from European samples.
6
The review recommends precautionary measures and standardized experimental protocols to improve comparability and evidence quality.
7
The systematic review included 12 studies, comprising six analyses of tap water and six of bottled water.
Research Object
Microplastic contamination in tap and bottled drinking water
Research Subject
The prevalence, polymer composition, concentration, methodological variability, and estimated human exposure associated with microplastics in drinking water
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-07-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
340
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai15
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing2000
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials2011
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration2009
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement2015
The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants2017
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration2009
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation2015
Human Consumption of Microplastics2019
Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality2019
Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool2019
A Review of Microplastics in Table Salt, Drinking Water, and Air: Direct Human Exposure2020
Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates2016
Focal plane array detector-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging for the analysis of microplastics in environmental samples2015
Cited by6
Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood2022
Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy2022
Microplastic sources, formation, toxicity and remediation: a review2023
Immunotoxicity and intestinal effects of nano- and microplastics: a review of the literature2020
Potential Health Impact of Microplastics: A Review of Environmental Distribution, Human Exposure, and Toxic Effects2023
Microplastics in the Environment: Intake through the Food Web, Human Exposure and Toxicological Effects2021