The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Влияние генеративного искусственного интеллекта на социально-экономическое неравенство и разработку государственной политики
Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Daron Acemoğlu, Valerio Capraro, Austin Lentsch, Selin Akgün, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A. C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt‐Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Chiara Longoni, Pete Lunn, Simone Natale, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander van der Linden, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Riccardo Viale, Werner H. Kunz, Stefanie Paluch
2024-05-31

AI policymakingdigital dividegenerative artificial intelligencemisinformationsocioeconomic inequalities
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section, we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
1
Existing policy frameworks in the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom do not fully address generative AI’s socioeconomic challenges; concrete policies and interdisciplinary research are needed to promote shared prosperity.
2
Generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may substantially increase the production and spread of misinformation.
3
Generative AI enables personalized education and potentially improved healthcare diagnostics and accessibility, but may widen the digital divide and deepen existing health inequalities.
4
Generative AI has dual potential: it may exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities while also helping reduce persistent social problems.
5
In workplaces, generative AI may raise productivity and create jobs, yet its economic benefits are likely to be distributed unevenly.

Generative artificial intelligence and its applications across information, work, education, healthcare, and policymaking

The impacts of generative AI on socioeconomic inequalities, misinformation, productivity, access, and policy effectiveness

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-05-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
349
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jay Joseph Van Bavel
Daron Acemoğlu
Valerio Capraro
Austin Lentsch
Selin Akgün
Aisel Akhmedova
Ennio Bilancini
Jean‐François Bonnefon
Pablo Brañas‐Garza
Luigi Butera
Karen M. Douglas
Jim A. C. Everett
Gerd Gigerenzer
Christine Greenhow
Daniel A. Hashimoto
Julianne Holt‐Lunstad
Jolanda Jetten
Simon Johnson
Chiara Longoni
Pete Lunn
Simone Natale
Iyad Rahwan
Neil Selwyn
Vivek Singh
Siddharth Suri
Jennifer Sutcliffe
Joe Tomlinson
Sander van der Linden
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Friederike Wall
Riccardo Viale
Werner H. Kunz
Stefanie Paluch
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%