Diagnosis of Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Review of the Current Literature

Диагностика инфекционного перитонита кошек: обзор современной литературы
Katrin Hartmann, Sandra Felten
2019-11-15

Diagnostic algorithmsFIP diagnostic testsFeline coronavirusFeline infectious peritonitisSensitivity and specificity
Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a fatal disease that poses several challenges for veterinarians: clinical signs and laboratory changes are non-specific, and there are two pathotypes of the etiologic agent feline coronavirus (FCoV), sometimes referred to as feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) and feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) that vary fundamentally in their virulence, but are indistinguishable by a number of diagnostic methods. This review focuses on all important steps every veterinary practitioner has to deal with and new diagnostic tests that can be considered when encountering a cat with suspected FIP with the aim to establish a definitive diagnosis. It gives an overview on all available direct and indirect diagnostic tests and their sensitivity and specificity reported in the literature in different sample material. By providing summarized data for sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test and each sample material, which can easily be accessed in tables, this review can help to facilitate the interpretation of different diagnostic tests and raise awareness of their advantages and limitations. Additionally, diagnostic trees depict recommended diagnostic steps that should be performed in cats suspected of having FIP based on their clinical signs or clinicopathologic abnormalities. These steps can easily be followed in clinical practice.
1
Diagnostic decision trees provide recommended, clinically applicable testing steps for cats suspected of FIP based on clinical signs or clinicopathologic abnormalities.
2
Feline infectious peritonitis is difficult to diagnose because clinical and laboratory findings are nonspecific, while virulent FIPV and less-virulent FECV can be indistinguishable by several tests.
3
Tabulated sensitivity and specificity data support clinical interpretation of diagnostic tests and clarify their respective advantages and limitations.
4
The review comprehensively summarizes direct and indirect FIP diagnostic tests, including their reported sensitivity and specificity across different sample types.
5
The review highlights that definitive diagnosis requires integrating multiple diagnostic approaches rather than relying on a single universally discriminative test.

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) in cats and its etiologic feline coronaviruses, including FECV and FIPV

Diagnostic methods and diagnostic decision-making for suspected FIP, including the sensitivity, specificity, interpretation, and limitations of direct and indirect tests across different sample materials

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-11-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Katrin Hartmann
Sandra Felten
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%