Research in Information Systems: Intra-Disciplinary and Inter-Disciplinary Approaches
Исследования в области информационных систем: внутридисциплинарные и междисциплинарные подходы
2018-06-01
SCID: 54.1/5fepx4ua
Discuss with AI
AIS basket of eight journalsinformation systems researchinterdisciplinary knowledge creationintradisciplinary knowledge creationknowledge-materialization
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The deep embeddedness of information systems (IS) in many areas of human activity poses a dual challenge to the IS discipline: advancing an expanding disciplinary boundary that includes an increasing set of IS topics; and engaging with other disciplines in order to understand IS-enabled phenomena. An inability to meet these challenges could lead to conceptually stunted development of the IS discipline, missed opportunities to inform other disciplines and a failure to effectively contribute to solving the pressing problems of our time. We undertook this study to investigate both how IS research has addressed these challenges in the past and how it can continue to do so in the future. Drawing on the concept of knowledge-materialization through knowledge-creating practice, and based on approaches for disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge creation, we theorize four different types of knowledge contribution that IS researchers can produce, encompassing both an intradisciplinary and an interdisciplinary view. We then analyze a wide-ranging sample of research studies published in 176 papers in the AIS basket of eight journals to investigate the nature of their contribution vis-à-vis these types. We find that the predominant types of knowledge contribution are intradisciplinary, with relatively few interdisciplinary contributions. Based on our analysis, we explain why each type of knowledge contribution is important to the IS discipline and provide guidance for IS scholars in planning their research strategies for these contributions. We comment on the implications of our study for IS scholars and for the vigor and growth of the IS discipline.
Key Findings
1
Each contribution type is argued to be important for the discipline’s development, and guidance is provided for planning research strategies.
2
Intradisciplinary contributions predominate, while relatively few IS studies make interdisciplinary contributions.
3
It analyzes 176 papers from the AIS basket of eight journals to classify the nature of their knowledge contributions.
4
Strengthening both intradisciplinary expansion and interdisciplinary engagement is presented as essential to the vigor and growth of IS research.
5
The study theorizes four types of IS knowledge contributions spanning intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge creation.
Research Object
Information systems research and its disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge contributions
Research Subject
The nature, prevalence, and strategic development of intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge contributions in IS research
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-06-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
104
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest