A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes from a Circular Economy Perspective

Критический обзор процессов переработки литий-ионных аккумуляторов с точки зрения циркулярной экономики
Omar Velázquez-Martínez, Rodrigo Serna-Guerrero, Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio, Markus A. Reuter, Johanna Valio
2019-11-05

circular economyhydrometallurgical processinglithium-ion battery recyclingmechanical processingpyrometallurgical processing
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently one of the most important electrochemical energy storage devices, powering electronic mobile devices and electric vehicles alike. However, there is a remarkable difference between their rate of production and rate of recycling. At the end of their lifecycle, only a limited number of LIBs undergo any recycling treatment, with the majority go to landfills or being hoarded in households. Further losses of LIB components occur because the the state-of-the-art LIB recycling processes are limited to components with high economic value, e.g., Co, Cu, Fe, and Al. With the increasing popularity of concepts such as “circular economy” (CE), new LIB recycling systems have been proposed that target a wider spectrum of compounds, thus reducing the environmental impact associated with LIB production. This review work presents a discussion of the current practices and some of the most promising emerging technologies for recycling LIBs. While other authoritative reviews have focused on the description of recycling processes, the aim of the present was is to offer an analysis of recycling technologies from a CE perspective. Consequently, the discussion is based on the ability of each technology to recover every component in LIBs. The gathered data depicted a direct relationship between process complexity and the variety and usability of the recovered fractions. Indeed, only processes employing a combination of mechanical processing, and hydro- and pyrometallurgical steps seemed able to obtain materials suitable for LIB (re)manufacture. On the other hand, processes relying on pyrometallurgical steps are robust, but only capable of recovering metallic components.
1
Current state-of-the-art recycling primarily targets economically valuable components such as cobalt, copper, iron, and aluminum, causing further losses of other materials.
2
From a circular-economy perspective, recycling technologies should recover the broadest possible range of battery components and reduce the environmental impacts of new LIB production.
3
Greater process complexity is directly associated with increased diversity and usability of recovered fractions.
4
LIB production substantially exceeds recycling, leaving most end-of-life batteries landfilled or stockpiled in households.
5
Only integrated processes combining mechanical, hydrometallurgical, and pyrometallurgical steps appear capable of producing materials suitable for LIB remanufacture; pyrometallurgical-only processes are robust but mainly recover metals.

Lithium-ion battery recycling processes and systems

Their circular-economy performance, including component recovery breadth, recovered-material usability, environmental impact, and the relationship between process complexity and recovery outcomes

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-11-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
598
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Omar Velázquez-Martínez
Rodrigo Serna-Guerrero
Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio
Markus A. Reuter
Johanna Valio
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%