A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes
Качественная оценка процессов переработки литий-ионных аккумуляторов
2020-10-28
SCID: 54.1/ep2t62ar
Discuss with AI
SWAVE assessment matrixclosed-loop recyclingend-of-life batterieslithium-ion battery recyclingpyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
With the widespread adoption of e-mobility, there are high numbers of lithium Ion batteries (LIB) entering the waste stream. It is imperative that disposal and recycling strategies are developed and implemented. There is an urgent need for safe, environmentally friendly and economically affordable disposal routes for End of Life (EoL) LIBs. This study has looked at 44 commercial recyclers and assessed their recycling and reclamation processes. A novel qualitative assessment matrix termed “Strategic materials Weighting And Value Evaluation" (SWAVE) is proposed and used to compare the strategic importance and value of various materials in EoL LIBs. The sustainability and quality of recycled material are assessed by comparing the final form or composition after the recycling processes, the industrial processes and the industry type (primary sector, manufacturer or recycler). SWAVE is applied to each company, producing a score out of 20, with a higher number indicating that more materials can be recycled. The separation processes and resources from six of the prominent recycling companies are discussed further. The majority of recyclers use one or more of mechanical treatment, pyrometallurgy , or hydrometallurgy , concentrating upon high value metal extraction rather than closed-loop recycling of the metals or component materials, highlighting an environmental and technological gap. To improve the current circular economy of batteries reuse and repurposing of materials (closed-loop recycling), instead of purely recycling or recovery of metals should be considered for further development. Further studies of environmental trade-offs from recycling or recovering one material in preference to another is required.
Key Findings
1
It introduced the SWAVE matrix, scoring companies out of 20 according to the strategic importance and value of recoverable battery materials.
2
Most recyclers employ mechanical treatment, pyrometallurgy, or hydrometallurgy, prioritizing extraction of high-value metals over closed-loop material or component recycling.
3
The assessment identifies an environmental and technological gap between current metal recovery practices and battery circularity objectives.
4
The study qualitatively assessed recycling and reclamation processes across 44 commercial lithium-ion battery recyclers.
5
The study recommends greater development of reuse, repurposing, and closed-loop recycling, alongside research on environmental trade-offs when prioritizing particular materials.
Research Object
commercial end-of-life lithium-ion battery recycling processes and recyclers
Research Subject
qualitative assessment of material recovery, recycling breadth, sustainability, and closed-loop potential across recycling processes
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-10-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest