Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities

Квантовые симуляторы: архитектуры и возможности
Mikhail D. Lukin, Jelena Vučković, Eugene Demler, Jun Ye, Kai‐Mei C. Fu, C. Monroe, Markus Greiner, Irfan Siddiqi, Xiao Mi, P. Roushan, Kristan Temme, Vladan Vuletić, Sophia E. Economou, Kaden R. A. Hazzard, Brian DeMarco, M. Saffman, Kenneth R. Brown, Meenakshi Singh, Giuseppe Carleo, I. B. Spielman, Ehud Altman, Andrew C. Potter, Alicia J. Kollár, Kater Murch, Martin W. Zwierlein, Lincoln D. Carr, R. W. Simmonds, Cheng Chin, Shashank Misra, Monika Schleier-Smith, Ruichao Ma, Randall G. Hulet, Benjamin Lev, M. A. Eriksson, Kang-Kuen Ni, Zaira Nazario, David S. Weiss
2021-02-24

entanglementprogrammable quantum simulatorsquantum device architecturesquantum simulator software and hardwarequantum simulators
Quantum simulators are a promising technology on the spectrum of quantum devices from specialized quantum experiments to universal quantum computers. These quantum devices utilize entanglement and many-particle behavior to explore and solve hard scientific, engineering, and computational problems. Rapid development over the last two decades has produced more than 300 quantum simulators in operation worldwide using a wide variety of experimental platforms. Recent advances in several physical architectures promise a golden age of quantum simulators ranging from highly optimized special purpose simulators to flexible programmable devices. These developments have enabled a convergence of ideas drawn from fundamental physics, computer science, and device engineering. They have strong potential to address problems of societal importance, ranging from understanding vital chemical processes, to enabling the design of new materials with enhanced performance, to solving complex computational problems. It is the position of the community, as represented by participants of the National Science Foundation workshop on "Programmable Quantum Simulators," that investment in a national quantum simulator program is a high priority in order to accelerate the progress in this field and to result in the first practical applications of quantum machines. Such a program should address two areas of emphasis: (1) support for creating quantum simulator prototypes usable by the broader scientific community, complementary to the present universal quantum computer effort in industry; and (2) support for fundamental research carried out by a blend of multi-investigator, multidisciplinary collaborations with resources for quantum simulator software, hardware, and education.This document is a summary from a U.S. National Science Foundation supported workshop held on 16–17 September 2019 in Alexandria, VA. Attendees were charged to identify the scientific and community needs, opportunities, and significant challenges for quantum simulators over the next 2–5 years.
1
Emerging physical architectures could enable a range of devices, from highly optimized special-purpose simulators to flexible programmable quantum simulators.
2
More than 300 quantum simulators are reportedly operating worldwide across diverse experimental platforms after two decades of rapid development.
3
Quantum simulators may address societally important problems including chemical processes, advanced materials design, and complex computational tasks.
4
Quantum simulators occupy an intermediate space between specialized quantum experiments and universal quantum computers, exploiting entanglement and many-particle behavior.
5
The workshop community identified a national quantum simulator program as a high priority, emphasizing broadly usable prototypes and multidisciplinary support for software, hardware, and education.

quantum simulators and their physical architectures

their capabilities, development opportunities, and requirements for programmable, broadly usable quantum simulation systems

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-02-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
558
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mikhail D. Lukin
Jelena Vučković
Eugene Demler
Jun Ye
Kai‐Mei C. Fu
C. Monroe
Markus Greiner
Irfan Siddiqi
Xiao Mi
P. Roushan
Kristan Temme
Vladan Vuletić
Sophia E. Economou
Kaden R. A. Hazzard
Brian DeMarco
M. Saffman
Kenneth R. Brown
Meenakshi Singh
Giuseppe Carleo
I. B. Spielman
Ehud Altman
Andrew C. Potter
Alicia J. Kollár
Kater Murch
Martin W. Zwierlein
Lincoln D. Carr
R. W. Simmonds
Cheng Chin
Shashank Misra
Monika Schleier-Smith
Ruichao Ma
Randall G. Hulet
Benjamin Lev
M. A. Eriksson
Kang-Kuen Ni
Zaira Nazario
David S. Weiss
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%