Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and decision-making ability in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Влияние стробоскопической визуальной тренировки на время реакции и способность к принятию решений у спортсменов: систематический обзор и метаанализ
2025-11-17
SCID: 54.1/b8rw6ryz
Discuss with AI
athletesdecision-making abilityreaction timestroboscopic visual trainingsystematic review and meta-analysis
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Introduction This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of stroboscopic vision training on athletes’ reaction and decision-making ability, and examined the moderating role of key factors. Methods Literature searches were conducted in five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO and Scopus. Two researchers independently screened the articles and extracted the data. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model to analyze reaction time and decision-making ability, respectively. Subgroup analysis studied the moderating effects of participants’ age, sport experience, sport type, stroboscopic frequency, duty cycle, total intervention duration, weeks of intervention, intervention frequency and per session intervention duration. A total of 9 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, involving 323 athletes. Results Studies have shown that stroboscopic vision training has a significant impact on the improvement of reaction time (SMD = −0.82, 95% CI: −1.42, −0.22, p = 0.007), but has no significant effect on decision-making ability (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: −0.09, −1.11, p = 0.09). Subgroup analysis indicates that stroboscopic training for 1 to 6 weeks, with 1 to 2 sessions per week and 10 min of high-quality training each time, is an excellent training program for optimizing athletes’ reaction ability. Duty cycles of less than 10 Hz and less than 50% are more beneficial for improving athletes’ reaction ability (SMD = −1.38, p < 0.05; SMD = −1.38, p < 0.05). Strobe training has different effects on different sports types, and the performance of open skill athletes (SMD = −0.60, p < 0.05) was significantly better than that of closed skill athletes (SMD = −2.02, p > 0.05). The cognitive performance of adolescent athletes under the age of 18 improved to a certain extent after stroboscopic training (SMD = −0.32, p = 0.05). The study suggests that stroboscope training has little impact on decision-making ability. Only training experience (≥7.5 years: SMD = −3.9, p < 0.001) and short training time (≤10 min: SMD = −3.9, p < 0.001) have positive effects on decision-making ability. Discussion Based on this, these findings provide certain evidence for researchers and coaches, which can assist them in conducting stroboscopic training. However, due to the limitation of a small research sample size, further studies on optimizing stroboscopic training schemes are needed in the future to maximize the cognitive performance of athletes. Systematic review registration CRD42023418594, https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020 .
Key Findings
1
Stroboscopic visual training was evaluated for its effects on athletes' reaction time and decision-making via a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2
The review also aggregated data to assess stroboscopic training's effect on athletes' decision-making ability.
3
The study synthesized evidence across multiple trials to quantify stroboscopic training's impact on reaction time.
4
The work was registered (CRD42023418594) and followed PRISMA-2020 reporting guidelines.
Research Object
Athletes undergoing stroboscopic visual training
Research Subject
Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and decision-making ability
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-11-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
5
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai18
Effects of in-situ stroboscopic training on visual, visuomotor and reactive agility in youth volleyball players2023
Effects of six-week stroboscopic training program on visuomotor reaction speed in goal-directed movements in young volleyball players: a study focusing on agility performance2024
Repeated stroboscopic vision training improves anticipation skill without changing perceptual-cognitive skills in soccer players2023
An exploratory study on the effect of a four-week stroboscopic vision training program on soccer dribbling performance2022
The effect of stroboscopic vision training on the performance of elite curling athletes2024
Electrophysiological Evidence of Stroboscopic Training in Elite Handball Players: Visual Evoked Potentials Study2023
Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and movement accuracy in collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis2025
Effect of stroboscopic visual training in athletes2025
Stroboscopic Visual Training for Coaching Practitioners: A Comprehensive Literature Review2021
Short- and Long-Term Stroboscopic Training Effects on Visuomotor Performance in Elite Youth Sports. Part 1: Reaction and Behavior2020
Short- and Long-Term Stroboscopic Training Effects on Visuomotor Performance in Elite Youth Sports. Part 2: Brain–Behavior Mechanisms2020
The effect of stroboscopic visual training on eye–hand coordination2020
An early review of stroboscopic visual training: insights, challenges and accomplishments to guide future studies2019
The Effect of 4-Week Stroboscopic Training on Visual Function and Sport-Specific Visuomotor Performance in Top-Level Badminton Players2018
Stroboscopic vision and sustained attention during coincidence-anticipation2017
Effects of Stroboscopic Visual Training on Visual Attention, Motion Perception, and Catching Performance2015
Stroboscopic Training Enhances Anticipatory Timing2012
Improved Visual Cognition through Stroboscopic Training2011