Short- and Long-Term Stroboscopic Training Effects on Visuomotor Performance in Elite Youth Sports. Part 2: Brain–Behavior Mechanisms

Кратко- и долгоcрочные эффекты стробоскопической тренировки на визомоторную производительность в элитном юношеском спорте. Часть 2: механизмы «мозг–поведение»
Thorben Hülsdünker, Andreas Mierau, Nadira Gunasekara
2020-10-15

EEG BA6 negativityVlc (linear combination of N2 and N2-r)motion onset visual-evoked potentials (N2, N2-r)stroboscopic trainingvisuomotor reaction time
PURPOSE: Stroboscopic training has repeatedly been shown to improve visuomotor abilities. However, although performance improvements were attributed to visual processes, information on the neurophysiological mechanisms is missing. Part 2 of this study investigated the effects of stroboscopic training on neural visual and motor functions and its contribution to training-induced changes in visuomotor reaction time. METHODS: Forty-five young elite badminton athletes participated in this study, of which 32 (age, 13.7 yr) were included in the final data analysis. Participants were assigned to an intervention (stroboscopic vision) or control group (normal vision). Before and after a 10-wk training and after a 6-wk retention period, participants performed visual perception and reaction tasks in response to visual motion stimuli. The N2 and N2-r motion onset visual-evoked potentials, its linear combination (Vlc), and the BA6 negativity potential were determined using a 64-channel EEG. RESULTS: A significant TIME-GROUP effect was observed for the Vlc score (P = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.18), indicating a lower Vlc in the intervention group. However, post hoc tests did not reach significance. Within-subject correlation analyses revealed that changes in reaction speed were related to latency changes in N2 (r = 0.59, P < 0.001), N2-r (r = -0.64, P < 0.001), and the combined Vlc (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). Regression analyses across participants including multiple (N2/N2-r) or single (Vlc) predictors provided an explained variance of >60% (N2/N2-r, r2 = 0.62; Vlc, r2 = 0.64). No training effects or correlations were observed for the BA6 negativity. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that faster visuomotor reactions after stroboscopic training are accompanied by accelerated visual perception and processing, whereas motor processes seemed to be unaffected. Stroboscopic training may be promising to specifically address the visual system in visuomotor-demanding sports.
1
Conclusion: Faster visuomotor reactions after stroboscopic training are accompanied by accelerated visual perception and processing, indicating stroboscopic training specifically targets the visual system in visuomotor-demanding sports.
2
No training effects or correlations were observed for the BA6 negativity potential, suggesting motor processes were unaffected by stroboscopic training.
3
Regression models using N2/N2-r or Vlc predicted over 60% of variance in reaction speed improvements (N2/N2-r r2 = 0.62; Vlc r2 = 0.64).
4
Stroboscopic training led to a significant TIME-GROUP effect on the combined visual-evoked potential score (Vlc), indicating lower Vlc in the intervention group (P = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.18).
5
Within-subject changes in reaction speed correlated with latency changes in visual ERPs: N2 (r = 0.59, P < 0.001), N2-r (r = -0.64, P < 0.001), and Vlc (r = 0.68, P < 0.001).

Elite youth badminton athletes undergoing stroboscopic versus normal-vision training

Neurophysiological visual and motor mechanisms (EEG markers N2, N2-r, Vlc, BA6 negativity) underlying training-induced changes in visuomotor reaction time

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-10-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Thorben Hülsdünker
Andreas Mierau
Nadira Gunasekara
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%