Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

Генеративный искусственный интеллект и академическая добросовестность в высшем образовании: систематический обзор и направления дальнейших исследований
Kyle Bittle, Omar El-Gayar
2025-04-08

Generative AIacademic dishonestyacademic integrityhigher educationsystematic literature review
This systematic literature review rigorously evaluates the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on academic integrity within higher education settings. The primary objective is to synthesize how GenAI technologies influence student behavior and academic honesty, assessing the benefits and risks associated with their integration. We defined clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on studies explicitly discussing GenAI’s role in higher education from January 2021 to December 2024. Databases included ABI/INFORM, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and JSTOR, with the last search conducted in May 2024. A total of 41 studies met our precise inclusion criteria. Our synthesis methods involved qualitative analysis to identify common themes and quantify trends where applicable. The results indicate that while GenAI can enhance educational engagement and efficiency, it also poses significant risks of academic dishonesty. We critically assessed the risk of bias in included studies and noted a limitation in the diversity of databases, which might have restricted the breadth of perspectives. Key implications suggest enhancing digital literacy and developing robust detection tools to effectively manage GenAI’s dual impacts. No external funding was received for this review. Future research should expand database sources and include more diverse study designs to overcome current limitations and refine policy recommendations.
1
Future research should broaden database coverage and study designs to support more refined policy recommendations.
2
GenAI can improve educational engagement and efficiency, but it also creates significant risks of academic dishonesty.
3
The evidence base is limited by database diversity, potential bias, and insufficiently diverse study designs.
4
The review recommends strengthening digital literacy and developing robust detection tools to manage GenAI’s dual effects.
5
The systematic review synthesized 41 studies published from January 2021 to December 2024 on GenAI and academic integrity in higher education.

Generative AI technologies in higher education settings

Their impact on student behavior and academic integrity, including educational benefits and risks of academic dishonesty

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-04-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
227
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kyle Bittle
Omar El-Gayar
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%