Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance
Оценка взаимосвязи между внедрением генеративного ИИ, этическими соображениями и эффективностью организации
2024-07-01
SCID: 54.1/d4etrdeh
Discuss with AI
Generative AI adoptionPLS-SEMethical considerationsinstitutional pressuresorganizational performance
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Numerous enterprises employ Generative AI (GenAI) for a plethora of business operations, which can enhance organizational effectiveness. The adoption might be driven by multiple factors influencing the business landscape. Additionally, numerous ethical considerations could impact the deployment of GenAI. This unique study investigated how organizations adopt GenAI and its effects on their performance. Further, this research utilized institutional theory and ethical guidelines for AI design to develop a research framework examining how organizations adopt GenAI and its impact on their performance. A survey of 384 managers from information technology (IT) and information technology-enabled services (ITeS) companies was conducted. Data analysis was done using PLS-SEM to examine and validate the proposed model. The study outcome reveals that institutional pressures, i.e., coercive, normative and mimetic forces, influence the use of GenAI in organizations. It was also found that fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy influence the use of GenAI. Also, the results divulge that the use of GenAI influences organizational performance and is moderated by organizational innovativeness. This study provides insights to developers of GenAI, senior management of companies, the government and IT policymakers by highlighting the institutional pressures and ethical principles influencing the use of GenAI.
Key Findings
1
A PLS-SEM analysis of survey data validates a framework combining institutional theory and AI ethical guidelines to explain GenAI adoption and its performance impact.
2
Ethical factors—fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy, and autonomy—affect organizations' adoption and use of GenAI.
3
Institutional pressures—coercive, normative, and mimetic—positively influence organizational use of Generative AI (GenAI).
4
Organizational innovativeness moderates the relationship between GenAI use and organizational performance.
5
Use of GenAI has a positive influence on organizational performance based on survey data from 384 IT and ITeS managers.
Research Object
Organizational adoption and use of Generative AI (GenAI) in IT and ITeS companies
Research Subject
How institutional pressures (coercive, normative, mimetic) and ethical considerations (fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy, autonomy) influence GenAI adoption and how GenAI use affects organizational performance, moderated by organizational innovativeness
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
145
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai2
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy2023
Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT2023