GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

GRADE: формирующийся консенсус по оценке качества доказательств и силы рекомендаций
Gordon Guyatt, Holger J. Schünemann, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Yngve Falck–Ytter, Pablo Alonso‐Coello
2008-04-24
SCID:  54.1/fch9b2gb Discuss with AI
GRADEevidence gradingguideline ratingquality of evidencestrength of recommendations
Abstract (AI)
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide
Key Findings
1
GRADE is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide, indicating an emerging consensus.
2
Guidelines currently show inconsistency in rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
3
The GRADE system offers advantages for rating evidence quality and recommendation strength.
Research Object

The GRADE system for rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Research Subject

Advantages and emerging consensus on using GRADE to rate quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical guidelines

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-04-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Gordon Guyatt
Holger J. Schünemann
Andrew D Oxman
Regina Kunz
Gunn Elisabeth Vist
Yngve Falck–Ytter
Pablo Alonso‐Coello
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%