Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society

Управление стигмой в международных отношениях: трансгрессивные идентичности, нормы и порядок в международном обществе
Rebecca Adler‐Nissen
2014-01-01

international orderinternational relationsnorm-violating statesstigma managementtransgressive identities
Abstract This article develops a theoretical approach to stigma in international relations and resituates conventional approaches to the study of norms and international order. Correcting the general understanding that common values and norms are the building blocks of social order, this article claims that international society is in part constructed through the stigmatization of “transgressive” and norm-violating states and their ways of coping with stigma. Drawing on Erving Goffman, this article shows that states are not passive objects of socialization, but active agents. Stigmatized states cope strategically with their stigma and may, in some cases, challenge and even transform a dominant moral discourse. A typology of stigma management strategies is presented:stigma recognition(illustrated by Germany);stigma rejection(illustrated by Austria); and finallycounter-stigmatization(illustrated by Cuba). Because of the lack of agreement on what constitutes normal state behavior, attempts to impose stigma may even have the opposite effect—the stigmatizers become the transgressive. A focus on stigma opens up new avenues for research on norms, identities, and international order.
1
Disagreement over normal state behavior can cause stigmatization attempts to backfire, making the stigmatizers appear transgressive themselves.
2
International society is partly constructed through stigmatization of transgressive and norm-violating states, not solely through shared values and norms.
3
Stigmatized states are active agents that strategically manage stigma rather than passive objects of international socialization.
4
Stigmatized states can challenge and potentially transform dominant moral discourse through their responses to stigma.
5
The article identifies three stigma-management strategies: stigma recognition, stigma rejection, and counter-stigmatization, illustrated by Germany, Austria, and Cuba.

Stigmatized and transgressive states in international society

State strategies for coping with stigma and their effects on norms, identities, and international order

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Rebecca Adler‐Nissen
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%