Comparison of the Quality of Aqueous Dispersions of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes Using Surfactants and Biomolecules

Сравнение качества водных дисперсий одностенных углеродных нанотрубок с использованием поверхностно-активных веществ и биомолекул
Reto Haggenmueller, Sameer S. Rahatekar, Jeffrey Fagan, Jaehun Chun, Matthew L. Becker, Rajesh R. Naik, Todd D. Krauss, Lisa J. Carlson, John F. Kadla, Paul C. Trulove, Douglas F. Fox, Hugh C. DeLong, Zhichao Fang, Shana O. Kelley, Jeffrey W. Gilman
2008-04-29

aqueous dispersionsoptical absorption and fluorescence spectroscopysingle-wall carbon nanotubessurfactantswrapping polymers
The use of single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) in current and future applications depends on the ability to process SWCNTs in a solvent to yield high-quality dispersions characterized by individual SWCNTs and possessing a minimum of SWCNT bundles. Many approaches for the dispersion of SWCNTs have been reported. However, there is no general assessment which compares the relative quality and dispersion efficiency of the respective methods. Herein we report a quantitative comparison of the relative ability of "wrapping polymers" including oligonucleotides, peptides, lignin, chitosan, and cellulose and surfactants such as cholates, ionic liquids, and organosulfates to disperse SWCNTs in water. Optical absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy provide quantitative characterization (amount of SWCNTs that can be suspended by a given surfactant and its ability to debundle SWCNTs) of these suspensions. Sodium deoxy cholate (SDOCO), oligonucleotides (GT)(15), (GT)(10), (AC)(15), (AC)(10), C(10-30), and carboxymethylcellulose (CBMC-250K) exhibited the highest quality suspensions of the various systems studied in this work. The information presented here provides a good framework for further study of SWCNT purification and applications.
1
Optical absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy quantify both the suspended SWCNT amount and the degree of nanotube debundling.
2
Sodium deoxycholate, several oligonucleotides, and carboxymethylcellulose produced the highest-quality suspensions among the systems evaluated.
3
The comparison establishes a framework for selecting dispersion agents in SWCNT purification and applications.
4
The study addresses the lack of a general assessment comparing relative SWCNT dispersion quality across methods.
5
The study quantitatively compares water-based SWCNT dispersion quality and efficiency across wrapping polymers, biomolecules, and surfactants.

Aqueous dispersions of single-wall carbon nanotubes stabilized by surfactants and biomolecules

Dispersion quality and debundling efficiency, including the amount of individually suspended SWCNTs, of different surfactants and biomolecular wrapping agents

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-04-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Reto Haggenmueller
Sameer S. Rahatekar
Jeffrey Fagan
Jaehun Chun
Matthew L. Becker
Rajesh R. Naik
Todd D. Krauss
Lisa J. Carlson
John F. Kadla
Paul C. Trulove
Douglas F. Fox
Hugh C. DeLong
Zhichao Fang
Shana O. Kelley
Jeffrey W. Gilman
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%