Optimizing Surfactant Concentrations for Dispersion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solution

Оптимизация концентраций поверхностно-активных веществ для диспергирования одностенных углеродных нанотрубок в водном растворе
Adam J. Blanch, Claire E. Lenehan, Jamie S. Quinton
2010-07-12

UV-vis-NIR spectroscopyaqueous surfactant dispersionoptimal surfactant concentrationsingle-walled carbon nanotubessonication-centrifugation
The sonication-centrifugation technique is commonly used for dispersing single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) in aqueous surfactant solutions. However, the methodologies and materials used for this purpose are widely varied, and few dispersive agents have been studied systematically. This work describes a systematic study into the ability of some well-known (and some less common) surfactants and polymers to disperse SWCNTs fabricated by two different techniques. UV-vis-NIR absorbance spectra of their supernatant solutions showed that the smaller ionic surfactants were generally more effective dispersants, with larger polymer and surfactant molecules exhibiting a reduced performance for ensembles of carbon nanotubes of smaller average diameter. Optimal surfactant concentrations were established for dispersions of carbon nanotubes produced by the electric arc method in aqueous solutions of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium deoxycholate, Triton X-405, Brij S-100, Pluronic F-127, and polyvinylpyrrolidone. This optimum value was determined as the point at which the relative concentration of nanotubes dispersed is maximized, before flocculation-inducing attractive depletion interactions begin to dominate. The aggregation state of carbon nanotubes dispersed in sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate was probed by AFM at different stages of rebundling, showing the length dependence of these effects.
1
A systematic study compared the ability of ionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, and polymers to disperse SWCNTs produced by two fabrication techniques.
2
AFM analysis of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate dispersions revealed length-dependent aggregation during nanotube rebundling.
3
Optimal concentrations were established for arc-produced SWCNT dispersions using sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium deoxycholate, Triton X-405, Brij S-100, Pluronic F-127, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
4
Smaller ionic surfactants generally dispersed SWCNTs more effectively, whereas larger polymers and surfactants performed worse for ensembles with smaller average nanotube diameters.
5
The optimal concentration maximized the relative amount of dispersed nanotubes before attractive depletion interactions induced flocculation.

Single-walled carbon nanotubes dispersed in aqueous surfactant and polymer solutions

The effects of surfactant and polymer type and concentration on SWCNT dispersion efficiency, aggregation, and rebundling, including the length dependence of these behaviors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-07-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Adam J. Blanch
Claire E. Lenehan
Jamie S. Quinton
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%