Manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture and usual care for prophylaxis of episodic migraine without aura: multicentre, randomised clinical trial
Мануальная акупунктура по сравнению с имитацией акупунктуры и обычной медицинской помощью для профилактики эпизодической мигрени без ауры: многоцентровое рандомизированное клиническое исследование
2020-03-25
SCID: 54.1/m599c4p4
Discuss with AI
episodic migraine without auramanual acupuncturemigraine prophylaxisrandomised clinical trialsham acupuncture
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of manual acupuncture as prophylactic treatment for acupuncture naive patients with episodic migraine without aura. Design Multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial with blinded participants, outcome assessment, and statistician. Setting Seven hospitals in China, 5 June 2016 to 15 November 2018. Participants 150 acupuncture naive patients with episodic migraine without aura. Interventions 20 sessions of manual acupuncture at true acupuncture points plus usual care, 20 sessions of non-penetrating sham acupuncture at heterosegmental non-acupuncture points plus usual care, or usual care alone over 8 weeks. Main outcome measures Change in migraine days and migraine attacks per four weeks during weeks 1-20 after randomisation compared with baseline (four weeks before randomisation). Results Among 150 randomised patients (mean age 36.5 (SD 11.4) years; 123 (82%) women), 147 were included in the full analysis set. Compared with sham acupuncture, manual acupuncture resulted in a significantly greater reduction in migraine days at weeks 13 to 20 and a significantly greater reduction in migraine attacks at weeks 17 to 20. The reduction in mean number of migraine days was 3.5 (SD 2.5) for manual versus 2.4 (3.4) for sham (adjusted difference −1.4, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to −0.3; P=0.005) at weeks 13 to 16 and 3.9 (3.0) for manual versus 2.2 (3.2) for sham (adjusted difference −2.1, −2.9 to −1.2; P<0.001) at weeks 17 to 20. At weeks 17 to 20, the reduction in mean number of attacks was 2.3 (1.7) for manual versus 1.6 (2.5) for sham (adjusted difference −1.0, −1.5 to −0.5; P<0.001). No severe adverse events were reported. No significant difference was seen in the proportion of patients perceiving needle penetration between manual acupuncture and sham acupuncture (79% v 75%; P=0.891). Conclusions Twenty sessions of manual acupuncture was superior to sham acupuncture and usual care for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine without aura. These results support the use of manual acupuncture in patients who are reluctant to use prophylactic drugs or when prophylactic drugs are ineffective, and it should be considered in future guidelines. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02765581 .
Key Findings
1
At weeks 17–20, manual acupuncture reduced migraine days by 3.9 versus 2.2 with sham acupuncture; adjusted difference was −2.1 days (P<0.001).
2
In a multicentre randomised trial of 150 acupuncture-naive patients, 20 manual acupuncture sessions were evaluated for episodic migraine prophylaxis.
3
Manual acupuncture reduced migraine attacks more than sham acupuncture at weeks 17–20, with an adjusted difference of −1.0 attacks (P<0.001).
4
Manual acupuncture reduced migraine days more than sham acupuncture during weeks 13–16 and 17–20 after randomisation.
5
No severe adverse events occurred, and perceived needle penetration did not differ significantly between manual and sham acupuncture.
Research Object
Acupuncture-naive patients with episodic migraine without aura
Research Subject
The prophylactic efficacy of manual acupuncture, assessed by reductions in migraine days and migraine attacks compared with sham acupuncture and usual care
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-03-25
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest