Authoritarian Cooptation of Civil Society: The Case of Belarus
Авторитарная кооптация гражданского общества: случай Беларуси
2022-01-02
SCID: 54.1/pju2x45w
Discuss with AI
2020 mass protestsBelarusauthoritarian cooptationcivil society
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In Belarus, a vibrant civil society coexisted for the better part of the past decade with a firmly entrenched autocracy in a depoliticised cooptation mode. Through cooptation, the energy of civil society was channelled from representing a threat to the regime into being its resource. However, the capacity developed by civil society during this period of political inactivity was quickly redeployed for political purposes at the junction of economic crisis, the regime’s failure to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. After the 2020 mass protests, in which civil society played a pivotal role, the regime’s attitude to civil society turned to suppression and hostility.
Key Findings
1
Belarusian civil society coexisted with an entrenched autocracy under a depoliticised cooptation strategy for most of the past decade.
2
Civil society developed capacities during the depoliticised period that were rapidly redeployed for political purposes during economic crisis, pandemic failures, and the 2020 election.
3
Civil society played a pivotal role in the 2020 mass protests against the regime.
4
Cooptation redirected civil society energy from posing a threat to the regime toward serving as a resource for the regime.
5
Following the 2020 protests, the regime shifted from cooptation to suppression and hostility toward civil society.
Research Object
Civil society in Belarus
Research Subject
The dynamics of authoritarian cooptation, redeployment for political mobilization, and subsequent suppression of civil society by the Belarusian autocratic regime
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-01-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
34
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest