Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Интервенции позитивной психологии: метаанализ рандомизированных контролируемых исследований
2013-02-07
SCID: 54.1/qpmk8b62
Discuss with AI
depressive symptomsmeta-analysispositive psychology interventionsrandomized controlled studiessubjective well-being
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy. RESULTS: The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions.
Key Findings
1
A meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled studies involving 6,139 participants evaluated positive psychology interventions across self-help, group, and individual formats.
2
Depression outcomes improved more with longer, individually delivered interventions targeting people with psychosocial problems and recruited through referrals or hospitals.
3
Effects on subjective and psychological well-being remained small but statistically significant three to six months after intervention, suggesting partial sustainability.
4
Positive psychology interventions produced small improvements in subjective well-being (standardized mean difference 0.34), psychological well-being (0.20), and depression (0.23).
5
Study heterogeneity was high, study quality varied considerably, and indications of publication bias supported the need for additional high-quality research in diverse clinical populations.
Research Object
Positive psychology interventions (self-help, group training, and individual therapy)
Research Subject
The effectiveness and sustainability of positive psychology interventions in improving subjective and psychological well-being and reducing depressive symptoms
Publication Details
Publication Date
2013-02-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest