Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth

Институты как фундаментальная причина долгосрочного экономического роста
Daron Acemoğlu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson
2004-05-01

economic developmenteconomic institutionspolitical institutionsproperty rights enforcementquasi-natural experiments
This paper develops the empirical and theoretical case that differences in economic institutions are the fundamental cause of differences in economic development.We first document the empirical importance of institutions by focusing on two "quasi-natural experiments" in history, the division of Korea into two parts with very different economic institutions and the colonization of much of the world by European powers starting in the fifteenth century.We then develop the basic outline of a framework for thinking about why economic institutions differ across countries.Economic institutions determine the incentives of and the constraints on economic actors, and shape economic outcomes.As such, they are social decisions, chosen for their consequences.Because different groups and individuals typically benefit from different economic institutions, there is generally a conflict over these social choices, ultimately resolved in favor of groups with greater political power.The distribution of political power in society is in turn determined by political institutions and the distribution of resources.Political institutions allocate de jure political power, while groups with greater economic might typically possess greater de facto political power.We therefore view the appropriate theoretical framework as a dynamic one with political institutions and the distribution of resources as the state variables.These variables themselves change over time because prevailing economic institutions affect the distribution of resources, and because groups with de facto political power today strive to change political institutions in order to increase their de jure political power in the future.Economic institutions encouraging economic growth emerge when political institutions allocate power to groups with interests in broad-based property rights enforcement, when they create effective constraints on power-holders, and when there are relatively few rents to be captured by power-holders.We illustrate the assumptions, the workings and the implications of this framework using a number of historical examples.
1
Differences in economic institutions are identified as the fundamental cause of cross-country differences in long-run economic development.
2
Economic institutions shape incentives and constraints, while their selection reflects conflicts among groups with differing interests and political power.
3
European colonization offers a second quasi-natural experiment linking imposed institutional arrangements to persistent differences in economic outcomes.
4
Growth-promoting institutions arise when political institutions support broad property-rights enforcement, constrain power-holders, and limit opportunities for rent capture.
5
The contrasting economic trajectories of North and South Korea provide a quasi-natural historical experiment demonstrating the importance of institutions.

Economic institutions across countries and historical contexts

How economic institutions causally shape long-run economic growth and development through incentives, constraints, resource distribution, and political power

Publication Details
Publication Date
2004-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Daron Acemoğlu
Simon Johnson
James A. Robinson
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%