Quantitative Evaluation of Surfactant-stabilized Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes: Dispersion Quality and Its Correlation with Zeta Potential
Количественная оценка одностенных углеродных нанотрубок, стабилизированных поверхностно-активными веществами: качество дисперсии и его корреляция с дзета-потенциалом
2008-06-25
SCID: 54.1/syv7wb28
Discuss with AI
atomic force microscopydispersion qualitysingle-walled carbon nanotubessurfactant-stabilized dispersionszeta potential
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Stable dispersions of single-walled carbon nanotubes in deionized water were prepared using six common surfactants: sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS), tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (TTAB), sodium cholate (SC), and Fairy liquid (FL). For all nanotube dispersions ( C NT = 1 mg/mL), the optimum concentration of surfactant was found to be close to C Surf = 10 mg/mL by measuring the fraction of nanotubes remaining after centrifugation for a range of surfactant concentrations. The aggregation state of each nanotube−surfactant dispersion was characterized as a function of nanotube concentration by AFM analysis of large numbers of nanotubes/bundles deposited onto substrates. The dispersion quality could then be quantified by four parameters: the saturation value (at low concentration) of the root-mean-square bundle diameter, the maximum value of the total number of dispersed objects (individuals and bundles) per unit volume of dispersion, the saturation value (at low concentration) of the number fraction of individual nanotubes, and the maximum value of the number of individual nanotubes per unit volume of dispersion. According to these metrics, the dispersion quality of the six surfactant−nanotube dispersions varied as SDS > LDS > SDBS > TTAB > SC > Fairy liquid. It was found that each of these dispersion-quality metrics scaled very well with the measured ζ-potential of the surfactant−nanotube dispersion. This confirms that dispersion quality is controlled by the magnitude of electrostatic repulsive forces between coated nanotubes.
Key Findings
1
AFM-based analysis quantified dispersion quality using bundle diameter, total dispersed-object density, individual-nanotube fraction, and individual-nanotube density.
2
All dispersion-quality metrics correlated strongly with zeta potential, indicating that electrostatic repulsion between coated nanotubes controls dispersion quality.
3
Dispersion quality ranked as SDS > LDS > SDBS > TTAB > sodium cholate > Fairy liquid across the four metrics.
4
For nanotube concentrations of 1 mg/mL, the optimum surfactant concentration was approximately 10 mg/mL for all tested surfactants.
5
Stable single-walled carbon nanotube dispersions were prepared in deionized water using six common surfactants.
Research Object
Surfactant-stabilized single-walled carbon nanotube dispersions in deionized water
Research Subject
Dispersion quality, aggregation state, and their correlation with zeta potential and electrostatic repulsive forces
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-06-25
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest