Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review
Устойчивое развитие: значение, история, принципы, составляющие и последствия для деятельности человека: обзор литературы
2019-01-01
SCID: 54.1/uejzb9ad
Discuss with AI
PRISMA guidelinesRecursive Content Abstractionenvironmental economic and social pillarsintergenerational equitysustainable development
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Sustainable development (SD) has become a popular catchphrase in contemporary development discourse. However, in spite of its pervasiveness and the massive popularity it has garnered over the years, the concept still seems unclear as many people continue to ask questions about its meaning and history, as well as what it entails and implies for development theory and practice. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discourse on SD by further explaining the paradigm and its implications for human thinking and actions in the quest for sustainable development. This is done through extensive literature review, combining aspects of the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Recursive Content Abstraction (RCA) analytical approach. The paper finds and argues that the entire issue of sustainable development centres around inter- and intragenerational equity anchored essentially on three-dimensional distinct but interconnected pillars, namely the environment, economy, and society. Decision-makers need to be constantly mindful of the relationships, complementarities, and trade-offs among these pillars and ensure responsible human behaviour and actions at the international, national, community and individual levels in order to uphold and promote the tenets of this paradigm in the interest of human development. More needs to be done by the key players—particularly the United Nations (UN), governments, private sector, and civil society organisations—in terms of policies, education and regulation on social, economic and environmental resource management to ensure that everyone is sustainable development aware, conscious, cultured and compliant.
Key Findings
1
Decision-makers must account for relationships, complementarities, and trade-offs among the three pillars when shaping development actions.
2
Sustainable development is fundamentally centered on achieving both intergenerational and intragenerational equity.
3
Sustainable development requires responsible behavior at international, national, community, and individual levels.
4
The paradigm rests on three distinct but interconnected pillars: environmental protection, economic development, and social well-being.
5
The review identifies a need for stronger policies, education, and regulation by the UN, governments, private sector, and civil society to promote sustainable resource management and public compliance.
Research Object
the sustainable development paradigm
Research Subject
the meaning, historical development, principles, three-pillar structure, inter- and intragenerational equity, and implications for human thinking and action
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1857
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis2005
The qualitative content analysis process2008
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty2012
The Economics of Welfare1933
Cited by3
Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low Carbon Grid Electricity Generation and Supply2022
Rethinking Sustainability Towards a Regenerative Economy2021
Drama/Theatre Performance in Education through the Use of Digital Technologies for Enhancing Students’ Sustainability Awareness: A Literature Review2023